These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

147 related items for PubMed ID: 1947611

  • 1. [Comparison of the methods of cytobrush and Ayre spatula in the concentration of endocervical cells].
    Longatto Filho A, Maeda MY, Santos DR, de Andréa Filho A, Cavaliere MJ, Shih LW, Oyafuso MS.
    Rev Paul Med; 1991; 109(3):93-6. PubMed ID: 1947611
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis cervical infection: a comparison of Papanicolaou and immunofluorescent staining in smears obtained by Ayre's spatula and cytobrush.
    Maeda MY, Longatto Filho A, Santos DR, Cavaliere MJ, Shih LW, Oyafuso MS, De Andrea Filho A.
    Pathologica; 1991; 83(1083):105-9. PubMed ID: 1714070
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Improved endocervical sampling with the Cytobrush.
    Chalvardjian A, De Marchi WG, Bell V, Nishikawa R.
    CMAJ; 1991 Feb 01; 144(3):313-7. PubMed ID: 1989710
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Cervical smears following laser treatment. Comparison of Cervex brush versus Cytobrush-Ayre spatula sampling.
    Szarewski A, Cuzick J, Singer A.
    Acta Cytol; 1991 Feb 01; 35(1):76-8. PubMed ID: 1994639
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The Cytobrush effect on Pap smear adequacy.
    Davey-Sullivan B, Gearhart J, Evers CG, Cason Z, Replogle WH.
    Fam Pract Res J; 1991 Mar 01; 11(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 2028815
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of spatula and nonspatula methods for cervical sampling.
    Rammou-Kinia R, Anagnostopoulou I, Gomousa M.
    Acta Cytol; 1991 Mar 01; 35(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 1994638
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of the Cytobrush plus plastic spatula with the Cervex Brush for obtaining endocervical cells.
    Cannon JM, Blythe JG.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Oct 01; 82(4 Pt 1):569-72. PubMed ID: 8377984
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The Cell-Sweep. A new cervical cytology sampling device.
    Tyau L, Hernandez E, Anderson L, Heller P, Edmonds P.
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Nov 01; 39(11):899-902. PubMed ID: 7853282
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Cervical cytology with the Papette sampler.
    Ferenczy A, Robitaille J, Guralnick M, Shatz R.
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Apr 01; 39(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 8040849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Sampling accuracy of the modified Ayre spatula/Zelsmyr Cytobrush versus the modified Ayre spatula/bulb aspirator in the collection of cells from the uterine cervix.
    Selvaggi SM, Malviya V.
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1991 Apr 01; 7(3):318-22. PubMed ID: 1879271
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparison of Cytobrush sampling, spatula sampling and combined Cytobrush-spatula sampling of the uterine cervix.
    Buntinx F, Boon ME, Beck S, Knottnerus JA, Essed GG.
    Acta Cytol; 1991 Apr 01; 35(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 1994637
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The effectiveness and safety of two cervical cytologic techniques during pregnancy.
    Stillson T, Knight AL, Elswick RK.
    J Fam Pract; 1997 Aug 01; 45(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 9267375
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Efficacy of the cytobrush versus the cotton swab in the collection of endocervical cells.
    Kristensen GB, Hølund B, Grinsted P.
    Acta Cytol; 1989 Aug 01; 33(6):849-51. PubMed ID: 2588918
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Effect of the size of extended, modified Ayre's spatula on endocervical cell yield in the postmenopausal women.
    Parnpoonsarp W, Ploarsa P, Arpakorn V.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Jun 01; 92 Suppl 3():S9-14. PubMed ID: 19702064
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Consequences of the introduction of combined spatula and Cytobrush sampling for cervical cytology. Improvements in smear quality and detection rates.
    Boon ME, Alons-van Kordelaar JJ, Rietveld-Scheffers PE.
    Acta Cytol; 1986 Jun 01; 30(3):264-70. PubMed ID: 3521176
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Analysis of five sampling methods for the preparation of cervical smears.
    Boon ME, de Graaff Guilloud JC, Rietveld WJ.
    Acta Cytol; 1989 Jun 01; 33(6):843-8. PubMed ID: 2588917
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.