These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

114 related items for PubMed ID: 19479682

  • 1. Fetal anatomic evaluation in the overweight and obese gravida.
    Thornburg LL, Miles K, Ho M, Pressman EK.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jun; 33(6):670-5. PubMed ID: 19479682
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Fetal nuchal translucency thickness evaluation in the overweight and obese gravida.
    Thornburg LL, Mulconry M, Post A, Carpenter A, Grace D, Pressman EK.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jun; 33(6):665-9. PubMed ID: 19479678
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Factors affecting feasibility and quality of second-trimester ultrasound scans in obese pregnant women.
    Fuchs F, Houllier M, Voulgaropoulos A, Levaillant JM, Colmant C, Bouyer J, Senat MV.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jan; 41(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 23023941
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The Role of Early Gestation Ultrasound in the Assessment of Fetal Anatomy in Maternal Obesity.
    Romary L, Sinkovskaya E, Ali S, Cunningham TD, Marwitz S, Heeze A, Herlands L, Porche L, Philips J, Abuhamad A.
    J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Jun; 36(6):1161-1168. PubMed ID: 28417475
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Impact of maternal obesity and maternal overweight on the detection rate of fetal heart defects and the image quality of prenatal echocardiography.
    Uhden M, Knippel AJ, Stressig R, Hammer R, Siegmann H, Froehlich S, Kozlowski P.
    Ultraschall Med; 2011 Dec; 32 Suppl 2():E108-14. PubMed ID: 21877317
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The impact of maternal obesity on midtrimester sonographic visualization of fetal cardiac and craniospinal structures.
    Hendler I, Blackwell SC, Bujold E, Treadwell MC, Wolfe HM, Sokol RJ, Sorokin Y.
    Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 2004 Dec; 28(12):1607-11. PubMed ID: 15303105
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The influence of maternal body mass index on fetal anomaly screening.
    Hunsley C, Farrell T.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Nov; 182():181-4. PubMed ID: 25305661
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Ultrasound screening for fetal aneuploidy using soft markers in the overweight and obese gravida.
    Tsai LJ, Ho M, Pressman EK, Thornburg LL.
    Prenat Diagn; 2010 Sep; 30(9):821-6. PubMed ID: 20575150
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Completion and Sensitivity of the Second-Trimester Fetal Anatomic Survey in Obese Gravidas.
    Pasko DN, Wood SL, Jenkins SM, Owen J, Harper LM.
    J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Nov; 35(11):2449-2457. PubMed ID: 27698181
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Optimal timing of the second trimester fetal ultrasound in the obese gravida.
    Weatherborn M, McGuinness B, Ogamba MI, Leung K, Leftwich HK.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Jul; 35(14):2703-2707. PubMed ID: 32715824
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Does advanced ultrasound equipment improve the adequacy of ultrasound visualization of fetal cardiac structures in the obese gravid woman?
    Hendler I, Blackwell SC, Treadwell MC, Bujold E, Sokol RJ, Sorokin Y.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jun; 190(6):1616-9; discussion 1619-20. PubMed ID: 15284753
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Limitations of the fetal anatomic survey via ultrasound in the obese obstetrical population.
    Chung JH, Pelayo R, Hatfield TJ, Speir VJ, Wu J, Caughey AB.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 Oct; 25(10):1945-9. PubMed ID: 22384816
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A Matter of Time: Does Gestational Age Affect the Duration of the Fetal Anatomic Survey?
    Poehlmann JR, Timmel A, Adams JH, Gupta VK, Rhoades JS, Iruretagoyena JI, Hoppe KK, Antony KM.
    J Ultrasound Med; 2021 Sep; 40(9):1763-1770. PubMed ID: 33155692
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Sonographic birth-weight prediction in obese patients using the gestation-adjusted prediction method.
    Thornburg LL, Barnes C, Glantz JC, Pressman EK.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jul; 32(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 18543370
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Influence of maternal body mass index on sonographic fetal weight estimation prior to scheduled delivery.
    Aksoy H, Aksoy Ü, Karadağ Öİ, Yücel B, Aydın T, Babayiğit MA.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2015 Oct; 41(10):1556-61. PubMed ID: 26171763
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Associations of gestational weight loss with birth-related outcome: a retrospective cohort study.
    Beyerlein A, Schiessl B, Lack N, von Kries R.
    BJOG; 2011 Jan; 118(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 21054761
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The impact of body mass index on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a retrospective study in a UK obstetric population, 2004-2011.
    Scott-Pillai R, Spence D, Cardwell CR, Hunter A, Holmes VA.
    BJOG; 2013 Jul; 120(8):932-9. PubMed ID: 23530609
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Offspring body size and metabolic profile - effects of lifestyle intervention in obese pregnant women.
    Tanvig M.
    Dan Med J; 2014 Jul; 61(7):B4893. PubMed ID: 25123127
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.