These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

175 related items for PubMed ID: 19484181

  • 1. Pupillary responses to intranasal trigeminal and olfactory stimulation.
    Schneider CB, Ziemssen T, Schuster B, Seo HS, Haehner A, Hummel T.
    J Neural Transm (Vienna); 2009 Jul; 116(7):885-9. PubMed ID: 19484181
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Arousal responses to olfactory or trigeminal stimulation during sleep.
    Stuck BA, Stieber K, Frey S, Freiburg C, Hörmann K, Maurer JT, Hummel T.
    Sleep; 2007 Apr; 30(4):506-10. PubMed ID: 17520795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Chemosensory event-related potentials in relation to side of stimulation, age, sex, and stimulus concentration.
    Stuck BA, Frey S, Freiburg C, Hörmann K, Zahnert T, Hummel T.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Jun; 117(6):1367-75. PubMed ID: 16651024
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The influence of training on chemosensory event-related potentials and interactions between the olfactory and trigeminal systems.
    Livermore A, Hummel T.
    Chem Senses; 2004 Jan; 29(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 14752039
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Are there sex-related differences in responses to repetitive olfactory/trigeminal stimuli?
    Scheibe M, Opatz O, Hummel T.
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Aug; 266(8):1323-6. PubMed ID: 19002476
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Recordings of the optical intrinsic signal from the middle turbinate in response to olfactory and trigeminal stimulation: a pilot study.
    Ishimaru T, Scheibe M, Gudziol V, Negoias S.
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Jul; 265(7):781-5. PubMed ID: 18043931
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The influence of mecamylamine on trigeminal and olfactory chemoreception of nicotine.
    Thuerauf N, Markovic K, Braun G, Bleich S, Reulbach U, Kornhuber J, Lunkenheimer J.
    Neuropsychopharmacology; 2006 Feb; 31(2):450-61. PubMed ID: 16123771
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Time-course of trigeminal versus olfactory stimulation: evidence from chemosensory evoked potentials.
    Flohr EL, Boesveldt S, Haehner A, Iannilli E, Sinding C, Hummel T.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Mar; 95(3):388-94. PubMed ID: 25697131
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Responses to olfactory and intranasal trigeminal stimuli: relation to the respiratory cycle.
    Haehner A, Gruenewald G, Dibenedetto M, Hummel T.
    Neuroscience; 2011 Feb 23; 175():178-83. PubMed ID: 21145944
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Co-stimulation with an olfactory stimulus increases arousal responses to trigeminal stimulation.
    Stuck BA, Baja J, Lenz F, Herr RM, Heiser C.
    Neuroscience; 2011 Mar 10; 176():442-6. PubMed ID: 21223995
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Differences in human evoked potentials related to olfactory or trigeminal chemosensory activation.
    Hummel T, Kobal G.
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1992 Mar 10; 84(1):84-9. PubMed ID: 1370406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Topographical differences in the trigeminal sensitivity of the human nasal mucosa.
    Scheibe M, Zahnert T, Hummel T.
    Neuroreport; 2006 Sep 18; 17(13):1417-20. PubMed ID: 16932150
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The neural representation of odor is modulated by the presence of a trigeminal stimulus during odor encoding.
    Bensafi M, Frasnelli J, Reden J, Hummel T.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Mar 18; 118(3):696-701. PubMed ID: 17208517
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Lateralization in human nasal chemoreception: differences in bilateral electrodermal responses related to olfactory and trigeminal stimuli.
    Brand G, Millot JL, Saffaux M, Morand-Villeneuve N.
    Behav Brain Res; 2002 Jul 18; 133(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 12110454
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Responses to trigeminal irritants at different locations of the human nasal mucosa.
    Scheibe M, van Thriel C, Hummel T.
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Jan 18; 118(1):152-5. PubMed ID: 17975506
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Central processing of odor concentration is a temporal phenomenon as revealed by chemosensory event-related potentials (CSERP).
    Pause BM, Sojka B, Ferstl R.
    Chem Senses; 1997 Feb 18; 22(1):9-26. PubMed ID: 9056082
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. How chemical information processing interferes with face processing: a magnetoencephalographic study.
    Walla P, Mayer D, Deecke L, Lang W.
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jan 01; 24(1):111-7. PubMed ID: 15588602
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Effects of short inter-stimulus intervals on olfactory and trigeminal event-related potentials.
    Kassab A, Schaub F, Vent J, Hüttenbrink KB, Damm M.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2009 Nov 01; 129(11):1250-6. PubMed ID: 19863320
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Memories evoked by odors stimulating the olfactory nerve versus odors stimulating both the olfactory and trigeminal nerves: possible qualitative differences?
    Czerniawska E, Zegardło E, Wojciechowski J.
    Percept Mot Skills; 2013 Aug 01; 117(1):1290-8. PubMed ID: 24422354
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effects of intranasal ZnSO4 irrigation on olfactory and trigeminal cues.
    Hansen LF, Hammer M, Petersen SH, Nielsen GD.
    Physiol Behav; 1994 Apr 01; 55(4):699-704. PubMed ID: 8190797
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.