These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


209 related items for PubMed ID: 1948599

  • 1. Limitations in distinguishing malignant from benign lesions of the breast by systematic review of mammograms.
    Monostori Z, Herman PG, Carmody DP, Eacobacci TM, Capece NR, Cruz VM, Gentin S, Vernace FM.
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1991 Dec; 173(6):438-42. PubMed ID: 1948599
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [Radiology of nonpalpable breast lesions].
    Vega A, Nava E, Ortega E, Garijo F.
    Rev Med Univ Navarra; 1995 Dec; 39(4):11-7. PubMed ID: 9499837
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Bayesian network to predict breast cancer risk of mammographic microcalcifications and reduce number of benign biopsy results: initial experience.
    Burnside ES, Rubin DL, Fine JP, Shachter RD, Sisney GA, Leung WK.
    Radiology; 2006 Sep; 240(3):666-73. PubMed ID: 16926323
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Computer-aided preoperative diagnosis of microcalcifications on mammograms.
    Kouskos E, Markopoulos C, Revenas K, Koufopoulos K, Kyriakou V, Gogas J.
    Acta Radiol; 2003 Jan; 44(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 12630997
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of independent double readings and computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) for the diagnosis of breast calcifications.
    Jiang Y, Nishikawa RM, Schmidt RA, Metz CE.
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Jan; 13(1):84-94. PubMed ID: 16399036
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Differentiation of benign from malignant solid breast masses: conventional US versus spatial compound imaging.
    Cha JH, Moon WK, Cho N, Chung SY, Park SH, Park JM, Han BK, Choe YH, Cho G, Im JG.
    Radiology; 2005 Dec; 237(3):841-6. PubMed ID: 16304106
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Use of artificial neural networks (computer analysis) in the diagnosis of microcalcifications on mammography.
    Markopoulos C, Kouskos E, Koufopoulos K, Kyriakou V, Gogas J.
    Eur J Radiol; 2001 Jul; 39(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 11439232
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Mammographic analysis of calcifications.
    Bassett LW.
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1992 Jan; 30(1):93-105. PubMed ID: 1732937
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Segmentation and numerical analysis of microcalcifications on mammograms using mathematical morphology.
    Betal D, Roberts N, Whitehouse GH.
    Br J Radiol; 1997 Sep; 70(837):903-17. PubMed ID: 9486066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Eliciting a terminology for mammographic calcifications.
    Alberdi E, Taylor P, Lee R, Fox J, Todd-Pokropek A.
    Clin Radiol; 2002 Nov; 57(11):1007-13. PubMed ID: 12409112
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.