These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

160 related items for PubMed ID: 1949427

  • 1. Microsurgical vasoepididymostomy: a comparison between the end-to-side anastomosis and the invagination technique.
    Shekarriz M, Pomer S.
    Urol Res; 1991; 19(5):285-7. PubMed ID: 1949427
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of intussusception pull-through end-to-side and conventional end-to-side microsurgical vasoepididymostomy: prospective randomized controlled study in male wistar rats.
    McCallum S, Li PS, Sheynkin Y, Su LM, Chan P, Goldstein M.
    J Urol; 2002 May; 167(5):2284-8. PubMed ID: 11956494
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Microsurgical epididymovasostomy by loop intussusception. A new technique in the rat model.
    Stefanović KB, Clark SA, Buncke HJ.
    Br J Urol; 1991 Nov; 68(5):518-23. PubMed ID: 1747729
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Fibrin-glue assisted vasoepididymostomy: a comparison to standard end-to-side microsurgical vasoepididymostomy in the rat model.
    Shekarriz BM, Thomas AJ, Sabanegh E, Kononov A, Levin HS.
    J Urol; 1997 Oct; 158(4):1602-5. PubMed ID: 9302182
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Microsurgical vasoepididymostomy: a prospective randomized study of 3 intussusception techniques in rats.
    Chan PT, Li PS, Goldstein M.
    J Urol; 2003 May; 169(5):1924-9. PubMed ID: 12686875
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Re: Comparison of intussusception pull-through end-to-side and conventional end-to-side microsurgical vasoepididymostomy: prospective randomized controlled study in male wistar rats.
    Shekarriz B, Pomer S.
    J Urol; 2003 Jan; 169(1):294. PubMed ID: 12478173
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Invagination vasoepididymoanastomosis with application of microsurgical tools].
    Makushin DG, Poluéktov VL.
    Urologiia; 2006 Jan; (3):79-80, 82-3. PubMed ID: 16889099
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Microsurgical epididymovasostomy in the rat: comparison of end-to-side and two invagination techniques.
    Popken G, Wetterauer U, Schultze-Seemann W.
    Urol Res; 1999 Jun; 27(3):214-8. PubMed ID: 10422824
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Management of the epididymal tubule during an end-to-side vasoepididymostomy.
    Marmar JL.
    J Urol; 1995 Jul; 154(1):93-6. PubMed ID: 7776465
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Microsurgical vasoepididymostomy: refinements and results.
    Schlegel PN, Goldstein M.
    J Urol; 1993 Oct; 150(4):1165-8. PubMed ID: 8371380
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Vasoepididymostomy to the head of the epididymis: a comparative study of two microsurgical techniques in the rabbit.
    Vancaillie T, Gordts S, Boeckx W, Vasquez G, Brosens I.
    Acta Eur Fertil; 1984 Oct; 15(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 6730862
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A modified single-armed technique for microsurgical vasoepididymostomy.
    Zhao L, Deng CH, Sun XZ, Chen Y, Wang WW, Zhao LY, Zeng LY, Tu XA.
    Asian J Androl; 2013 Jan; 15(1):79-82. PubMed ID: 23042447
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.