These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

734 related items for PubMed ID: 19500330

  • 1. Varicocele surgery: a decade's experience at a children's hospital.
    Diamond DA, Xuewu J, Cilento BG, Bauer SB, Peters CA, Borer JG, Mandell J, Cendron M, Rosoklija I, Zurakowski D, Retik AB.
    BJU Int; 2009 Jul; 104(2):246-9. PubMed ID: 19500330
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Managing varicoceles in children: results with microsurgical varicocelectomy.
    Schiff J, Kelly C, Goldstein M, Schlegel P, Poppas D.
    BJU Int; 2005 Feb; 95(3):399-402. PubMed ID: 15679802
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Lymphatic sparing microscopic retroperitoneal varicocelectomy: a preliminary experience.
    Wong J, Chan S, Pagala M, Friedman S.
    J Urol; 2009 Nov; 182(5):2460-3. PubMed ID: 19765758
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Laparoscopic Palomo varicocele surgery: lessons learned after 10 years' follow up of 156 consecutive pediatric patients.
    Méndez-Gallart R, Bautista-Casasnovas A, Estevez-Martínez E, Varela-Cives R.
    J Pediatr Urol; 2009 Apr; 5(2):126-31. PubMed ID: 19083272
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Varicocelectomy in adolescent boys: long-term experience with the Palomo procedure.
    Feber KM, Kass EJ.
    J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4 Suppl):1657-9; discussion 1659-60. PubMed ID: 18708215
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Optimizing the operative treatment of boys with varicocele: sequential comparison of 4 techniques.
    Riccabona M, Oswald J, Koen M, Lusuardi L, Radmayr C, Bartsch G.
    J Urol; 2003 Feb; 169(2):666-8. PubMed ID: 12544340
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Results and complications of laparoscopic surgery for pediatric varicocele.
    Esposito C, Monguzzi G, Gonzalez-Sabin MA, Rubino R, Montinaro L, Papparella A, Esposito G, Settimi A, Mastroianni L, Zamparelli M, Sacco R, Amici G, Damiano R, Innaro N.
    J Pediatr Surg; 2001 May; 36(5):767-9. PubMed ID: 11329585
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Sub-inguinal interruption of dilated veins in adolescent varicocele: should it be considered a gold standard technique?
    Cimador M, Castagnetti M, Ajovalasit V, Libri M, Bertozzi M, De Grazia E.
    Minerva Pediatr; 2003 Dec; 55(6):599-605. PubMed ID: 14676731
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Results of microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy in children and adolescents.
    Yaman O, Soygur T, Zumrutbas AE, Resorlu B.
    Urology; 2006 Aug; 68(2):410-2. PubMed ID: 16904464
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Treatment of palpable varicocele in infertile men: a meta-analysis to define the best technique.
    Cayan S, Shavakhabov S, Kadioğlu A.
    J Androl; 2009 Aug; 30(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 18772487
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparison of outcomes of different varicocelectomy techniques: open inguinal, laparoscopic, and subinguinal microscopic varicocelectomy: a randomized clinical trial.
    Al-Kandari AM, Shabaan H, Ibrahim HM, Elshebiny YH, Shokeir AA.
    Urology; 2007 Mar; 69(3):417-20. PubMed ID: 17382134
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Surgical comparison of subinguinal and high inguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy for adolescent varicocele.
    Shiraishi K, Oka S, Matsuyama H.
    Int J Urol; 2016 Apr; 23(4):338-42. PubMed ID: 26790833
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Varicocelectomy.
    Mellinger BC.
    Tech Urol; 1995 Apr; 1(4):188-96. PubMed ID: 9118390
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Bipolar electrothermal vessel sealing system and 5-mm 2 expandable trocar approach in pediatric laparoscopic varicocelectomy: a successful time-effective technical refinement.
    Méndez-Gallart R, Bautista-Casasnovas A, Estévez-Martínez E, Rodríguez-Barca P.
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2011 Oct; 21(5):e256-9. PubMed ID: 22002289
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Laparoscopic varicocele ligation: are there advantages compared with the microscopic subinguinal approach?
    McManus MC, Barqawi A, Meacham RB, Furness PD, Koyle MA.
    Urology; 2004 Aug; 64(2):357-60; discussion 360-1. PubMed ID: 15302494
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Subinguinal microvaricocelectomy versus retroperitoneal varicocelectomy: comparative study of complications and surgical outcome.
    Ghanem H, Anis T, El-Nashar A, Shamloul R.
    Urology; 2004 Nov; 64(5):1005-9. PubMed ID: 15533495
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Microsurgical treatment of varicocele in outpatients using the subinguinal approach.
    Testini M, Miniello S, Piccinni G, Di Venere B, Lissidini G, Esposito E.
    Minerva Chir; 2001 Dec; 56(6):655-9. PubMed ID: 11721208
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Is the laparoscopic Palomo procedure for pediatric varicocele safe and effective? Nine years of unicentric experience.
    Pini Prato A, MacKinlay GA.
    Surg Endosc; 2006 Apr; 20(4):660-4. PubMed ID: 16432660
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Testicular growth after successful varicocele correction in adolescents: comparison of artery sparing techniques with the Palomo procedure.
    Atassi O, Kass EJ, Steinert BW.
    J Urol; 1995 Feb; 153(2):482-3. PubMed ID: 7815628
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Microsurgical repair of the adolescent varicocele.
    Lemack GE, Uzzo RG, Schlegel PN, Goldstein M.
    J Urol; 1998 Jul; 160(1):179-81. PubMed ID: 9628646
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 37.