These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

219 related items for PubMed ID: 19505480

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Assortative mating for fitness and the evolution of recombination.
    Blachford A, Agrawal AF.
    Evolution; 2006 Jul; 60(7):1337-43. PubMed ID: 16929651
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Intralocus sexual conflict unresolved by sex-limited trait expression.
    Harano T, Okada K, Nakayama S, Miyatake T, Hosken DJ.
    Curr Biol; 2010 Nov 23; 20(22):2036-9. PubMed ID: 21055943
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Intralocus sexual conflict.
    van Doorn GS.
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2009 Jun 23; 1168():52-71. PubMed ID: 19566703
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Cryptic sex-ratio bias provides indirect genetic benefits despite sexual conflict.
    Cox RM, Calsbeek R.
    Science; 2010 Apr 02; 328(5974):92-4. PubMed ID: 20203012
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Sexually antagonistic co-evolution: a model and an empirical test.
    Hoyle A, Gilburn AS.
    J Evol Biol; 2010 Jan 02; 23(1):166-74. PubMed ID: 20002256
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Assortative mating by fitness and sexually antagonistic genetic variation.
    Arnqvist G.
    Evolution; 2011 Jul 02; 65(7):2111-6. PubMed ID: 21729064
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Gamete traits influence the variance in reproductive success, the intensity of sexual selection, and the outcome of sexual conflict among congeneric sea urchins.
    Levitan DR.
    Evolution; 2008 Jun 02; 62(6):1305-16. PubMed ID: 18363865
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Sexual selection and immune function in Drosophila melanogaster.
    McKean KA, Nunney L.
    Evolution; 2008 Feb 02; 62(2):386-400. PubMed ID: 18070086
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Experimental evidence that sexual conflict influences the opportunity, form and intensity of sexual selection.
    Hall MD, Bussière LF, Hunt J, Brooks R.
    Evolution; 2008 Sep 02; 62(9):2305-15. PubMed ID: 18540949
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Differential selection between the sexes and selection for sex.
    Roze D, Otto SP.
    Evolution; 2012 Feb 02; 66(2):558-74. PubMed ID: 22276548
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Assessing the potential for an ongoing arms race within and between the sexes: selection and heritable variation.
    Friberg U, Lew TA, Byrne PG, Rice WR.
    Evolution; 2005 Jul 02; 59(7):1540-51. PubMed ID: 16153039
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Competitive speciation and costs of choosiness.
    Kopp M, Hermisson J.
    J Evol Biol; 2008 Jul 02; 21(4):1005-23. PubMed ID: 18513357
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Evolutionary conflicts of interest: are female sexual decisions different?
    Eberhard WG.
    Am Nat; 2005 May 02; 165 Suppl 5():S19-25. PubMed ID: 15795858
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.