These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

377 related items for PubMed ID: 19507982

  • 1. Multitalker speech perception with ideal time-frequency segregation: effects of voice characteristics and number of talkers.
    Brungart DS, Chang PS, Simpson BD, Wang D.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):4006-22. PubMed ID: 19507982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effects of target-masker contextual similarity on the multimasker penalty in a three-talker diotic listening task.
    Iyer N, Brungart DS, Simpson BD.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Nov; 128(5):2998-10. PubMed ID: 21110595
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A model for multitalker speech perception.
    Srinivasan S, Wang D.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Nov; 124(5):3213-24. PubMed ID: 19045805
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effect of target-masker similarity on across-ear interference in a dichotic cocktail-party listening task.
    Brungart DS, Simpson BD.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1724. PubMed ID: 17927432
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Spectral and temporal changes to speech produced in the presence of energetic and informational maskers.
    Cooke M, Lu Y.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):2059-69. PubMed ID: 20968376
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of multiple simultaneous talkers.
    Brungart DS, Simpson BD, Ericson MA, Scott KR.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Nov; 110(5 Pt 1):2527-38. PubMed ID: 11757942
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The foreign language cocktail party problem: Energetic and informational masking effects in non-native speech perception.
    Cooke M, Garcia Lecumberri ML, Barker J.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jan; 123(1):414-27. PubMed ID: 18177170
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of two simultaneous talkers.
    Brungart DS.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Mar; 109(3):1101-9. PubMed ID: 11303924
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Contributions of talker characteristics and spatial location to auditory streaming.
    Allen K, Carlile S, Alais D.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Mar; 123(3):1562-70. PubMed ID: 18345844
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Speech recognition with varying numbers and types of competing talkers by normal-hearing, cochlear-implant, and implant simulation subjects.
    Cullington HE, Zeng FG.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jan; 123(1):450-61. PubMed ID: 18177173
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: effects of hearing loss and presentation level.
    Summers V, Molis MR.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Apr; 47(2):245-56. PubMed ID: 15157127
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Determining the energetic and informational components of speech-on-speech masking.
    Kidd G, Mason CR, Swaminathan J, Roverud E, Clayton KK, Best V.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jul; 140(1):132. PubMed ID: 27475139
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Isolating the energetic component of speech-on-speech masking with ideal time-frequency segregation.
    Brungart DS, Chang PS, Simpson BD, Wang D.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Dec; 120(6):4007-18. PubMed ID: 17225427
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Message and talker identification in older adults: effects of task, distinctiveness of the talkers' voices, and meaningfulness of the competing message.
    Rossi-Katz J, Arehart KH.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Apr; 52(2):435-53. PubMed ID: 19064902
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effects of periodic masker interruption on the intelligibility of interrupted speech.
    Iyer N, Brungart DS, Simpson BD.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1693. PubMed ID: 17927429
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Effectiveness of Two-Talker Maskers That Differ in Talker Congruity and Perceptual Similarity to the Target Speech.
    Calandruccio L, Buss E, Bowdrie K.
    Trends Hear; 2017 Sep; 21():2331216517709385. PubMed ID: 29169315
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Effect of priming on energetic and informational masking in a same-different task.
    Jones JA, Freyman RL.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Sep; 33(1):124-33. PubMed ID: 21841488
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Bimodal hearing and speech perception with a competing talker.
    Pyschny V, Landwehr M, Hahn M, Walger M, von Wedel H, Meister H.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Oct; 54(5):1400-15. PubMed ID: 21498577
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
    Cameron S, Dillon H, Newall P.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Informational Masking Effects on Neural Encoding of Stimulus Onset and Acoustic Change.
    Niemczak CE, Vander Werff KR.
    Ear Hear; 2019 Feb; 40(1):156-167. PubMed ID: 29782442
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.