These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

631 related items for PubMed ID: 19509344

  • 1. Comparison of the zygoma anchorage system with cervical headgear in buccal segment distalization.
    Kaya B, Arman A, Uçkan S, Yazici AC.
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):417-24. PubMed ID: 19509344
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Soft tissue, skeletal and dentoalveolar changes following conventional anchorage molar distalization therapy in class II non-growing subjects: a multicentric retrospective study.
    Fontana M, Cozzani M, Caprioglio A.
    Prog Orthod; 2012 May; 13(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 22583585
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparative evaluation of maxillary protraction with or without skeletal anchorage.
    Sar C, Arman-Özçırpıcı A, Uçkan S, Yazıcı AC.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 May; 139(5):636-49. PubMed ID: 21536207
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Molar distalization with a pendulum appliance K-loop combination.
    Acar AG, Gürsoy S, Dinçer M.
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Aug; 32(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 20231213
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Palatal implant versus zygoma plate anchorage for distalization of maxillary posterior teeth.
    Kaya B, Sar C, Arman-Özçirpici A, Polat-Özsoy O.
    Eur J Orthod; 2013 Aug; 35(4):507-14. PubMed ID: 22968670
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Effects of the reciprocal mini-chin cup appliance.
    Aslan BI, Dinçer M.
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Feb; 30(1):80-8. PubMed ID: 18276929
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Midpalatal miniscrews and high-pull headgear for anteroposterior and vertical anchorage control: cephalometric comparisons of treatment changes.
    Lee J, Miyazawa K, Tabuchi M, Kawaguchi M, Shibata M, Goto S.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Aug; 144(2):238-50. PubMed ID: 23910205
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Noncompliance maxillary molar distalization with the first class appliance: a randomized controlled trial.
    Papadopoulos MA, Melkos AB, Athanasiou AE.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):586.e1-586.e13; discussion 586-7. PubMed ID: 20451774
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Skeletal and dental effects of molar distalization using a modified palatal anchorage plate in adolescents.
    Sa'aed NL, Park CO, Bayome M, Park JH, Kim Y, Kook YA.
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Jul; 85(4):657-64. PubMed ID: 25191840
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A comparison of the skeletal, dental, and soft tissue effects caused by herbst and mandibular protraction appliances in the treatment of mandibular Class II malocclusions.
    Alves PF, Oliveira AG.
    World J Orthod; 2008 Jul; 9(1):e1-19. PubMed ID: 19641760
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Unilateral maxillary molar distalization with zygoma-gear appliance.
    Kilkis D, Bayram M, Celikoglu M, Nur M.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Aug; 142(2):e1-7. PubMed ID: 22858341
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G.
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Maxillary molar distalization with the indirect Palatal miniscrew for Anchorage and Distalization Appliance (iPANDA).
    Suzuki EY, Suzuki B.
    Orthodontics (Chic.); 2013 Apr; 14(1):e228-41. PubMed ID: 23646335
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The effectiveness of pendulum, K-loop, and distal jet distalization techniques in growing children and its effects on anchor unit: A comparative study.
    Marure PS, Patil RU, Reddy S, Prakash A, Kshetrimayum N, Shukla R.
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016 Apr; 34(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 27681396
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Midpalatal implants vs headgear for orthodontic anchorage--a randomized clinical trial: cephalometric results.
    Benson PE, Tinsley D, O'Dwyer JJ, Majumdar A, Doyle P, Sandler PJ.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):606-15. PubMed ID: 18005834
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The effects of cervical headgear with an expanded inner bow in the permanent dentition.
    Varlik SK, Iscan HN.
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Aug; 30(4):425-30. PubMed ID: 18678761
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Skeletal and dental components of Class II correction with the bionator and removable headgear splint appliances.
    Martins RP, da Rosa Martins JC, Martins LP, Buschang PH.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 19061799
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Molar Intrusion in Open-bite Adults Using Zygomatic Miniplates.
    Marzouk ES, Abdallah EM, El-Kenany WA.
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2015 Dec; 26(2):47-54. PubMed ID: 26349291
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Is bodily advancement of the lower incisors possible?
    Strahm C, De Sousa AP, Grobéty D, Mavropoulos A, Kiliaridis S.
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):425-31. PubMed ID: 19395370
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
    de Oliveira JN, Rodrigues de Almeida R, Rodrigues de Almeida M, de Oliveira JN.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 17628251
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 32.