These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


301 related items for PubMed ID: 19531105

  • 1. The effect of microrough surface treatment on miniscrews used as orthodontic anchors.
    Chang CS, Lee TM, Chang CH, Liu JK.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1178-84. PubMed ID: 19531105
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Removal torque values of titanium implants in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
    Buser D, Nydegger T, Hirt HP, Cochran DL, Nolte LP.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998 Oct; 13(5):611-9. PubMed ID: 9796144
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Histomorphological and torque removal comparison of 6 mm orthodontic miniscrews with and without surface treatment in New Zealand rabbits.
    Sirisa-Ard A, Woodroffe Michael SN, Ahmed K, Dunstan CR, Pearce SG, Bilgin AA, Dalci O, Darendeliler MA.
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Dec; 37(6):578-83. PubMed ID: 25608834
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Sequential bone healing of immediately loaded mini-implants.
    Serra G, Morais LS, Elias CN, Meyers MA, Andrade L, Muller C, Muller M.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 18617102
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Primary stability of turned and acid-etched screw-type implants: a removal torque and histomorphometric study in rabbits.
    Fernandes Ede L, Unikowski IL, Teixeira ER, da Costa NP, Shinkai RS.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007 Jul; 22(6):886-92. PubMed ID: 18271369
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Bone apposition around two different sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implant surfaces: a histomorphometric study in canine mandibles.
    Bornstein MM, Valderrama P, Jones AA, Wilson TG, Seibl R, Cochran DL.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Mar; 19(3):233-41. PubMed ID: 18177427
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
    Gahlert M, Gudehus T, Eichhorn S, Steinhauser E, Kniha H, Erhardt W.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Sequential bone healing of immediately loaded mini-implants: histomorphometric and fluorescence analysis.
    Serra G, Morais LS, Elias CN, Meyers MA, Andrade L, Müller CA, Müller M.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jan; 137(1):80-90. PubMed ID: 20122435
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Bone responses to titanium implants surface-roughened by sandblasted and double etched treatments in a rabbit model.
    Yang GL, He FM, Yang XF, Wang XX, Zhao SF.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):516-24. PubMed ID: 18602288
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Removal torque and histomorphometric investigation of 4 different titanium surfaces: an experimental study in the rabbit tibia.
    Cordioli G, Majzoub Z, Piattelli A, Scarano A.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000 Oct; 15(5):668-74. PubMed ID: 11055134
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Stability change of chemically modified sandblasted/acid-etched titanium palatal implants. A randomized-controlled clinical trial.
    Schätzle M, Männchen R, Balbach U, Hämmerle CH, Toutenburg H, Jung RE.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 May; 20(5):489-95. PubMed ID: 19302392
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A comparison of stability between delayed versus immediately loaded orthodontic palatal implants.
    Jackson A, Lemke R, Hatch J, Salome N, Gakunga P, Cochran D.
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2008 May; 20(3):174-84. PubMed ID: 18533979
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparative histomorphometry and resonance frequency analysis of implants with moderately rough surfaces in a loaded animal model.
    Al-Nawas B, Groetz KA, Goetz H, Duschner H, Wagner W.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 17944964
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Removal torque values of surface-treated mini-implants after loading.
    Kim SH, Cho JH, Chung KR, Kook YA, Nelson G.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 18617101
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Histomorphologic and histomophometric evaluation of immediately and early loaded mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage.
    Freire JN, Silva NR, Gil JN, Magini RS, Coelho PG.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jun; 131(6):704.e1-9. PubMed ID: 17561041
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Effect of alendronate on endosseous implant integration: an in vivo study in rabbits.
    Chacon GE, Stine EA, Larsen PE, Beck FM, McGlumphy EA.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Jul; 64(7):1005-9. PubMed ID: 16781331
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Histometric evaluation of bone around titanium implants with different surface treatments in rats exposed to cigarette smoke inhalation.
    Correa MG, Gomes Campos ML, César-Neto JB, Casati MZ, Nociti FH, Sallum EA.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jun; 20(6):588-93. PubMed ID: 19302391
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Tapered orthodontic miniscrews induce bone-screw cohesion following immediate loading.
    Yano S, Motoyoshi M, Uemura M, Ono A, Shimizu N.
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Dec; 28(6):541-6. PubMed ID: 17142258
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.