These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

398 related items for PubMed ID: 19548886

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Microscopic and physiologic evidence for biofilm-associated wound colonization in vivo.
    Davis SC, Ricotti C, Cazzaniga A, Welsh E, Eaglstein WH, Mertz PM.
    Wound Repair Regen; 2008; 16(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 18211576
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. In vitro comparison of antimicrobial activity of iodine and silver dressings against biofilms.
    Thorn RM, Austin AJ, Greenman J, Wilkins JP, Davis PJ.
    J Wound Care; 2009 Aug; 18(8):343-6. PubMed ID: 19862874
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Discrepancy between viable counts and light output as viability measurements, following ciprofloxacin challenge of self-bioluminescent Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms.
    Marques CN, Salisbury VC, Greenman J, Bowker KE, Nelson SM.
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2005 Oct; 56(4):665-71. PubMed ID: 16105852
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Impact of a novel, antimicrobial dressing on in vivo, Pseudomonas aeruginosa wound biofilm: quantitative comparative analysis using a rabbit ear model.
    Seth AK, Zhong A, Nguyen KT, Hong SJ, Leung KP, Galiano RD, Mustoe TA.
    Wound Repair Regen; 2014 Oct; 22(6):712-9. PubMed ID: 25230854
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Next science wound gel technology, a novel agent that inhibits biofilm development by gram-positive and gram-negative wound pathogens.
    Miller KG, Tran PL, Haley CL, Kruzek C, Colmer-Hamood JA, Myntti M, Hamood AN.
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2014 Jun; 58(6):3060-72. PubMed ID: 24637684
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Assessing the effect of an antimicrobial wound dressing on biofilms.
    Percival SL, Bowler P, Woods EJ.
    Wound Repair Regen; 2008 Jun; 16(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 18211579
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Bioburden-responsive antimicrobial PLGA ultrafine fibers for wound healing.
    Said SS, El-Halfawy OM, El-Gowelli HM, Aloufy AK, Boraei NA, El-Khordagui LK.
    Eur J Pharm Biopharm; 2012 Jan; 80(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 21924354
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Cadexomer iodine provides superior efficacy against bacterial wound biofilms in vitro and in vivo.
    Fitzgerald DJ, Renick PJ, Forrest EC, Tetens SP, Earnest DN, McMillan J, Kiedaisch BM, Shi L, Roche ED.
    Wound Repair Regen; 2017 Jan; 25(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 27859922
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Combinatorial effects of antibiotics and enzymes against dual-species Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms in the wound-like medium.
    Fanaei Pirlar R, Emaneini M, Beigverdi R, Banar M, B van Leeuwen W, Jabalameli F.
    PLoS One; 2020 Jan; 15(6):e0235093. PubMed ID: 32584878
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Antimicrobial coating agents: can biofilm formation on a breast implant be prevented?
    van Heerden J, Turner M, Hoffmann D, Moolman J.
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2009 May; 62(5):610-7. PubMed ID: 18359675
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Evaluation of short exposure times of antimicrobial wound solutions against microbial biofilms: from in vitro to in vivo.
    Johani K, Malone M, Jensen SO, Dickson HG, Gosbell IB, Hu H, Yang Q, Schultz G, Vickery K.
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2018 Feb 01; 73(2):494-502. PubMed ID: 29165561
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The interplay of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus in dual-species biofilms impacts development, antibiotic resistance and virulence of biofilms in in vitro wound infection models.
    Vestweber PK, Wächter J, Planz V, Jung N, Windbergs M.
    PLoS One; 2024 Feb 01; 19(5):e0304491. PubMed ID: 38805522
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Silver against Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms.
    Bjarnsholt T, Kirketerp-Møller K, Kristiansen S, Phipps R, Nielsen AK, Jensen PØ, Høiby N, Givskov M.
    APMIS; 2007 Aug 01; 115(8):921-8. PubMed ID: 17696948
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Use of internally validated in vitro biofilm models to assess antibiofilm performance of silver-containing gelling fibre dressings.
    Suleman L, Purcell L, Thomas H, Westgate S.
    J Wound Care; 2020 Mar 02; 29(3):154-161. PubMed ID: 32160088
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. An in vitro collagen perfusion wound biofilm model; with applications for antimicrobial studies and microbial metabolomics.
    Slade EA, Thorn RMS, Young A, Reynolds DM.
    BMC Microbiol; 2019 Dec 30; 19(1):310. PubMed ID: 31888471
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. In vitro activity of mupirocin on clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and its potential implications in chronic rhinosinusitis.
    Ha KR, Psaltis AJ, Butcher AR, Wormald PJ, Tan LW.
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Mar 30; 118(3):535-40. PubMed ID: 18090864
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.