These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


178 related items for PubMed ID: 19557443

  • 1. Effect of computer assistance on observer performance of approximal caries diagnosis using intraoral digital radiography.
    Araki K, Matsuda Y, Seki K, Okano T.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2010 Jun; 14(3):319-25. PubMed ID: 19557443
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Accuracy of caries detection with four storage phosphor systems and E-speed radiographs.
    Hintze H, Wenzel A, Frydenberg M.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 May; 31(3):170-5. PubMed ID: 12058264
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Detection of approximal caries in digital radiographs before and after correction for attenuation and visual response. An in vitro study.
    Li G, Yoshiura K, Welander U, Shi XQ, McDavid WD.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Mar; 31(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 12076051
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Effects of the automatic exposure compensation on the proximal caries diagnosis.
    Yoshiura K, Nakayama E, Shimizu M, Goto TK, Chikui T, Kawazu T, Okamura K.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):140-4. PubMed ID: 15897283
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Intraoral versus extraoral bitewing radiography in detection of enamel proximal caries: an ex vivo study.
    Abu El-Ela WH, Farid MM, Mostafa MS.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016 May; 45(4):20150326. PubMed ID: 26892946
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The efficacy of a computerized caries detector in intraoral digital radiography.
    Gakenheimer DC.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2002 Jul; 133(7):883-90. PubMed ID: 12148682
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A comparative study of different radiographic methods for detecting occlusal caries lesions.
    Tarım Ertas E, Küçükyılmaz E, Ertaş H, Savaş S, Yırcalı Atıcı M.
    Caries Res; 2014 Jul; 48(6):566-74. PubMed ID: 25073755
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Diagnostic accuracy of two software modalities for detection of caries lesions in digital radiographs from four dental systems.
    Hintze H.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Mar; 35(2):78-82. PubMed ID: 16549433
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Histologic and radiographic assessment of caries-like lesions localized at the crown margin.
    Zoellner A, Diemer B, Weber HP, Stassinakis A, Gaengler P.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 12239481
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Approximal caries depth assessment with storage phosphor versus film radiography. Evaluation of the caries-specific Oslo enhancement procedure.
    Svanaes DB, Moystad A, Larheim TA.
    Caries Res; 2000 Jul; 34(6):448-53. PubMed ID: 11093017
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.