These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

174 related items for PubMed ID: 19559561

  • 1. Factors affecting bony impingement in hip arthroplasty.
    Kurtz WB, Ecker TM, Reichmann WM, Murphy SB.
    J Arthroplasty; 2010 Jun; 25(4):624-34.e1-2. PubMed ID: 19559561
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The influence of stem offset and neck shaft angles on the range of motion in total hip arthroplasty.
    Shoji T, Yamasaki T, Izumi S, Hachisuka S, Ochi M.
    Int Orthop; 2016 Feb; 40(2):245-53. PubMed ID: 26224610
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Influence of hip center position, anterior inferior iliac spine morphology, and ball head diameter on range of motion in total hip arthroplasty.
    Tabata T, Kaku N, Tagomori H, Tsumura H.
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2019 Feb; 105(1):23-28. PubMed ID: 30509621
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Anatomic stem inserted according to native anteversion could reproduce the native anterior distance of the femoral head and decrease bony impingement in total hip arthroplasty.
    Yoshitani J, Kabata T, Kajino Y, Ueno T, Ueoka K, Yamamuro Y, Tsuchiya H.
    Int Orthop; 2020 Feb; 44(2):245-251. PubMed ID: 31456058
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Femoral head to neck offset after hip resurfacing is critical for range of motion.
    Girard J, Krantz N, Bocquet D, Wavreille G, Migaud H.
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2012 Feb; 27(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 21925779
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Double acetabular wall--a misleading point for hip arthroplasty: an anatomical, radiological, clinical study.
    Madadi F, Yazdanshenas H, Madadi F, Bazargan-Hejazi S.
    Int Orthop; 2013 Jun; 37(6):1007-11. PubMed ID: 23436163
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Factors affecting the potential for posterior bony impingement after total hip arthroplasty.
    Shoji T, Yamasaki T, Izumi S, Murakami H, Mifuji K, Sawa M, Yasunaga Y, Adachi N, Ochi M.
    Bone Joint J; 2017 Sep; 99-B(9):1140-1146. PubMed ID: 28860392
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Factors affecting hip range of motion in surface replacement arthroplasty.
    Vendittoli PA, Ganapathi M, Nuño N, Plamondon D, Lavigne M.
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2007 Nov; 22(9):1004-12. PubMed ID: 17870221
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Oversized cups as a major risk factor of postoperative pain after total hip arthroplasty.
    Odri GA, Padiolleau GB, Gouin FT.
    J Arthroplasty; 2014 Apr; 29(4):753-6. PubMed ID: 23927907
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. High Offset Stems Are Protective of Dislocation in High-Risk Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Vigdorchik JM, Sharma AK, Elbuluk AM, Carroll KM, Mayman DJ, Lieberman JR.
    J Arthroplasty; 2021 Jan; 36(1):210-216. PubMed ID: 32741711
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.