These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

184 related items for PubMed ID: 19560117

  • 1. Risk of invasive cervical cancer in relation to management of abnormal Pap smear results.
    Silfverdal L, Kemetli L, Andrae B, Sparén P, Ryd W, Dillner J, Strander B, Törnberg S.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Aug; 201(2):188.e1-7. PubMed ID: 19560117
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A study of Pap test history and histologically determined cervical cancer in NSW women, 1997-2003.
    Morrell S, Taylor R, Wain G.
    J Med Screen; 2005 Aug; 12(4):190-6. PubMed ID: 16417696
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Risk of invasive cervical cancer after three consecutive negative Pap smears.
    Coldman A, Phillips N, Kan L, Matisic J, Benedet L, Towers L.
    J Med Screen; 2003 Aug; 10(4):196-200. PubMed ID: 14738657
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. High-grade cervical abnormalities and screening intervals in New South Wales, Australia.
    Schindeler S, Morrell S, Zuo Y, Baker D.
    J Med Screen; 2008 Aug; 15(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 18416954
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Risk of invasive cervical cancer after Pap smears: the protective effect of multiple negatives.
    Coldman A, Phillips N, Kan L, Matisic J, Benedet L, Towers L.
    J Med Screen; 2005 Aug; 12(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 15814014
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Review of the screening history of Alberta women with invasive cervical cancer.
    Stuart GC, McGregor SE, Duggan MA, Nation JG.
    CMAJ; 1997 Sep 01; 157(5):513-9. PubMed ID: 9294389
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Risk factors for cervical cancer by histology.
    Brinton LA, Herrero R, Reeves WC, de Britton RC, Gaitan E, Tenorio F.
    Gynecol Oncol; 1993 Dec 01; 51(3):301-6. PubMed ID: 8112636
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Case-control study of the effectiveness of mass screening in reducing invasive cervical cancer].
    Makino H, Sato S, Yajima A, Fukao A.
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1991 Sep 01; 43(9):1226-32. PubMed ID: 1919184
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Laboratory performance measures: evidence against low-risk women explaining low detection rates of high-grade abnormalities.
    Mitchell HS.
    Cytopathology; 2005 Apr 01; 16(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 15787649
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.