These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1178 related items for PubMed ID: 19564765

  • 1. Stress analysis of the interface between cervical vertebrae end plates and the Bryan, Prestige LP, and ProDisc-C cervical disc prostheses: an in vivo image-based finite element study.
    Lin CY, Kang H, Rouleau JP, Hollister SJ, Marca FL.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul 01; 34(15):1554-60. PubMed ID: 19564765
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Magnetic resonance imaging clarity of the Bryan, Prodisc-C, Prestige LP, and PCM cervical arthroplasty devices.
    Sekhon LH, Duggal N, Lynch JJ, Haid RW, Heller JG, Riew KD, Seex K, Anderson PA.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar 15; 32(6):673-80. PubMed ID: 17413473
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Effect of two-level total disc replacement on cervical spine kinematics.
    Phillips FM, Tzermiadianos MN, Voronov LI, Havey RM, Carandang G, Dooris A, Patwardhan AG.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Oct 15; 34(22):E794-9. PubMed ID: 19829242
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. In situ contact analysis of the prosthesis components of Prodisc-L in lumbar spine following total disc replacement.
    Chen WM, Park C, Lee K, Lee S.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep 15; 34(20):E716-23. PubMed ID: 19752690
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Load sharing and stabilization effects of anterior cervical devices.
    Cheng BC, Burns P, Pirris S, Welch WC.
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Dec 15; 22(8):571-7. PubMed ID: 19956031
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Total disc replacement positioning affects facet contact forces and vertebral body strains.
    Rundell SA, Auerbach JD, Balderston RA, Kurtz SM.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov 01; 33(23):2510-7. PubMed ID: 18978591
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Cervical disc replacement-porous coated motion prosthesis: a comparative biomechanical analysis showing the key role of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
    McAfee PC, Cunningham B, Dmitriev A, Hu N, Woo Kim S, Cappuccino A, Pimenta L.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct 15; 28(20):S176-85. PubMed ID: 14560189
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Motion analysis of bryan cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior discectomy and fusion: results from a prospective, randomized, multicenter, clinical trial.
    Sasso RC, Best NM, Metcalf NH, Anderson PA.
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Aug 15; 21(6):393-9. PubMed ID: 18679092
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A biomimetic artificial intervertebral disc system composed of a cubic three-dimensional fabric.
    Shikinami Y, Kawabe Y, Yasukawa K, Tsuta K, Kotani Y, Abumi K.
    Spine J; 2010 Feb 15; 10(2):141-52. PubMed ID: 19944651
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A new cervical artificial disc prosthesis based on physiological curvature of end plate: a finite element analysis.
    Yu CC, Liu P, Huang DG, Jiang YH, Feng H, Hao DJ.
    Spine J; 2016 Nov 15; 16(11):1384-1391. PubMed ID: 27345748
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Influence of different artificial disc kinematics on spine biomechanics.
    Zander T, Rohlmann A, Bergmann G.
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Feb 15; 24(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 19121822
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Cervical spine biomechanics following implantation of a disc prosthesis.
    Galbusera F, Bellini CM, Raimondi MT, Fornari M, Assietti R.
    Med Eng Phys; 2008 Nov 15; 30(9):1127-33. PubMed ID: 18359659
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A biomechanical study of artificial cervical discs using computer simulation.
    Ahn HS, DiAngelo DJ.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Apr 15; 33(8):883-92. PubMed ID: 18404108
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Response of Charité total disc replacement under physiologic loads: prosthesis component motion patterns.
    O'Leary P, Nicolakis M, Lorenz MA, Voronov LI, Zindrick MR, Ghanayem A, Havey RM, Carandang G, Sartori M, Gaitanis IN, Fronczak S, Patwardhan AG.
    Spine J; 2005 Apr 15; 5(6):590-9. PubMed ID: 16291097
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The effect of implant size and device keel on vertebral compression properties in lumbar total disc replacement.
    Auerbach JD, Ballester CM, Hammond F, Carine ET, Balderston RA, Elliott DM.
    Spine J; 2010 Apr 15; 10(4):333-40. PubMed ID: 20362251
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 59.