These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

432 related items for PubMed ID: 19567644

  • 21. Does power Doppler ultrasonography improve the BI-RADS category assessment and diagnostic accuracy of solid breast lesions?
    Tozaki M, Fukuma E.
    Acta Radiol; 2011 Sep 01; 52(7):706-10. PubMed ID: 21596798
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Potential Use of American College of Radiology BI-RADS Mammography Atlas for Reporting and Assessing Lesions Detected on Dedicated Breast CT Imaging: Preliminary Study.
    Jung HK, Kuzmiak CM, Kim KW, Choi NM, Kim HJ, Langman EL, Yoon S, Steen D, Zeng D, Gao F.
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Nov 01; 24(11):1395-1401. PubMed ID: 28728854
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. [The value of ultrasound classification in BI-RADS category 4 of breast complex cystic masses].
    Yao JP, Niu LJ, Wang Y, Geng CY, Chang Q, Chen Y, Zhu L.
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2018 Sep 23; 40(9):672-675. PubMed ID: 30293391
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Value of the US BI-RADS final assessment following mastectomy: BI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions.
    Gweon HM, Son EJ, Youk JH, Kim JA, Chung J.
    Acta Radiol; 2012 Apr 01; 53(3):255-60. PubMed ID: 22302210
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. A dedicated BI-RADS training programme: effect on the inter-observer variation among screening radiologists.
    Timmers JM, van Doorne-Nagtegaal HJ, Verbeek AL, den Heeten GJ, Broeders MJ.
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep 01; 81(9):2184-8. PubMed ID: 21899969
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Downgrading of Breast Masses Suspicious for Cancer by Using Optoacoustic Breast Imaging.
    Menezes GLG, Pijnappel RM, Meeuwis C, Bisschops R, Veltman J, Lavin PT, van de Vijver MJ, Mann RM.
    Radiology; 2018 Aug 01; 288(2):355-365. PubMed ID: 29664342
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Automated ultrasound of the breast for diagnosis: interobserver agreement on lesion detection and characterization.
    Shin HJ, Kim HH, Cha JH, Park JH, Lee KE, Kim JH.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Sep 01; 197(3):747-54. PubMed ID: 21862820
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Inter-reader Variability in the Use of BI-RADS Descriptors for Suspicious Findings on Diagnostic Mammography: A Multi-institution Study of 10 Academic Radiologists.
    Lee AY, Wisner DJ, Aminololama-Shakeri S, Arasu VA, Feig SA, Hargreaves J, Ojeda-Fournier H, Bassett LW, Wells CJ, De Guzman J, Flowers CI, Campbell JE, Elson SL, Retallack H, Joe BN.
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Jan 01; 24(1):60-66. PubMed ID: 27793579
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Accuracy of classification of breast ultrasound findings based on criteria used for BI-RADS.
    Heinig J, Witteler R, Schmitz R, Kiesel L, Steinhard J.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep 01; 32(4):573-8. PubMed ID: 18421795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 22.