These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


229 related items for PubMed ID: 19573361

  • 61. Histopathology and cytopathology of cervical cancer.
    Jenkins D.
    Dis Markers; 2007; 23(4):199-212. PubMed ID: 17627056
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 62.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 63. Performance of Aptima and Cobas HPV testing platforms in detecting high-grade cervical dysplasia and cancer.
    Ge Y, Christensen P, Luna E, Armylagos D, Schwartz MR, Mody DR.
    Cancer Cytopathol; 2017 Aug; 125(8):652-657. PubMed ID: 28574670
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 64.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 65.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 66. [Comparative study on liquid-based cytology for cervical carcinoma screening in a high-risk area of China].
    Pan Q, Li L, Qiao Y.
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2001 Jul; 23(4):309-12. PubMed ID: 11783114
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 67.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 68.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 69. Novel techniques for morphometric and geometrical analysis in squamous intraepithelial lesions on cervical smears.
    Tsiambas E, Riziotis C, Mavrikos I, Armatas E, Patsouris E.
    J BUON; 2017 Jul; 22(4):1081-1083. PubMed ID: 28952232
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 70. Laboratory implementation and efficacy assessment of the ThinPrep cervical cancer screening system.
    Bolick DR, Hellman DJ.
    Acta Cytol; 1998 Jul; 42(1):209-13. PubMed ID: 9479342
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 71.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 72.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 73. How predictive is a cervical smear suggesting glandular neoplasia?
    Mathers ME, Johnson SJ, Wadehra V.
    Cytopathology; 2002 Apr; 13(2):83-91. PubMed ID: 11952746
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 74.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 75. Smear biopsies: a cause of negative follow-up biopsies in patients with premalignant conditions of the uterine cervix.
    Berner A, Høeg K, Oppedal BR.
    Diagn Gynecol Obstet; 1980 Apr; 2(2):99-101. PubMed ID: 7439010
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 76.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 77.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 78. [Adenocarcinoma of uterine cervix. Difficulties in the diagnosis of early forms and cyto-colpo-histological correlations].
    Cartier I.
    Ann Pathol; 2011 Nov; 31(5 Suppl):S107-8. PubMed ID: 22054442
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 79.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 80. Effect of the special properties of monolayer cell preparations for automated cervical cytology on visual evaluation and classification. With an estimation of the number of cells required to be screened.
    Schwarz G, Schwarz M, Schenck U.
    Anal Quant Cytol; 1983 Sep; 5(3):189-93. PubMed ID: 6651018
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.