These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
301 related items for PubMed ID: 19573727
1. Longer-term follow-up of patients recruited to the REACT (Rescue Angioplasty Versus Conservative Treatment or Repeat Thrombolysis) trial. Carver A, Rafelt S, Gershlick AH, Fairbrother KL, Hughes S, Wilcox R, REACT Investigators. J Am Coll Cardiol; 2009 Jul 07; 54(2):118-26. PubMed ID: 19573727 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Rescue angioplasty after failed thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Gershlick AH, Stephens-Lloyd A, Hughes S, Abrams KR, Stevens SE, Uren NG, de Belder A, Davis J, Pitt M, Banning A, Baumbach A, Shiu MF, Schofield P, Dawkins KD, Henderson RA, Oldroyd KG, Wilcox R, REACT Trial Investigators. N Engl J Med; 2005 Dec 29; 353(26):2758-68. PubMed ID: 16382062 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A randomized trial of rescue angioplasty versus a conservative approach for failed fibrinolysis in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the Middlesbrough Early Revascularization to Limit INfarction (MERLIN) trial. Sutton AG, Campbell PG, Graham R, Price DJ, Gray JC, Grech ED, Hall JA, Harcombe AA, Wright RA, Smith RH, Murphy JJ, Shyam-Sundar A, Stewart MJ, Davies A, Linker NJ, de Belder MA. J Am Coll Cardiol; 2004 Jul 21; 44(2):287-96. PubMed ID: 15261920 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Treatment of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in West Pomerania province of Poland. Comparison between primary coronary intervention and thrombolytic therapy. Dryja T, Kornacewicz-Jach Z, Goracy J, Przybycień K, Jodko L, Skowronek A, Kurowski M, Zinka E. Kardiol Pol; 2006 Jun 21; 64(6):591-9; discussion 600-1. PubMed ID: 16810577 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Repeat thrombolysis or conservative therapy vs. rescue percutaneous coronary intervention for failed thrombolysis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Testa L, van Gaal WJ, Biondi-Zoccai GG, Abbate A, Agostoni P, Bhindi R, Banning AP. QJM; 2008 May 21; 101(5):387-95. PubMed ID: 18287111 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of thrombolysis followed by broad use of percutaneous coronary intervention with primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment-elevation acute myocardial infarction: data from the french registry on acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (FAST-MI). Danchin N, Coste P, Ferrières J, Steg PG, Cottin Y, Blanchard D, Belle L, Ritz B, Kirkorian G, Angioi M, Sans P, Charbonnier B, Eltchaninoff H, Guéret P, Khalife K, Asseman P, Puel J, Goldstein P, Cambou JP, Simon T, FAST-MI Investigators. Circulation; 2008 Jul 15; 118(3):268-76. PubMed ID: 18591434 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of one-year outcome of patients aged <75 years versus ≥75 years undergoing "rescue" percutaneous coronary intervention. De Felice F, Fiorilli R, Parma A, Musto C, Nazzaro MS, Confessore P, Scappaticci M, Cifarelli A, Violini R. Am J Cardiol; 2011 Oct 15; 108(8):1075-80. PubMed ID: 21791331 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Primary percutaneous angioplasty, thrombolysis and conservative treatment in low-risk patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: effects on short- and long-term mortality. Grajek S, Araszkiewicz A, Lesiak M, Grygier M, Pyda M, Skorupski W, Mitkowski P, Baszko A. Kardiol Pol; 2012 Oct 15; 70(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 22267414 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention versus thrombolytic treatment: long term follow up according to infarct location. Henriques JP, Zijlstra F, van 't Hof AW, de Boer MJ, Dambrink JH, Gosselink AT, Hoorntje JC, Ottervanger JP, Suryapranata H. Heart; 2006 Jan 15; 92(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 15831596 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]