These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

611 related items for PubMed ID: 19577147

  • 1. Mandibular incisor position changes in relation to amount of bite jumping during Herbst/multibracket appliance treatment: a radiographic-cephalometric study.
    Martin J, Pancherz H.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 19577147
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Post-treatment effects of the Herbst appliance. A radiographic, clinical and biometric investigation.
    Hansen K.
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1992 Jul; 88():1-49. PubMed ID: 1492308
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Effects of headgear Herbst and mandibular step-by-step advancement versus conventional Herbst appliance and maximal jumping of the mandible.
    Du X, Hägg U, Rabie AB.
    Eur J Orthod; 2002 Apr; 24(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 12001553
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A comparison of the skeletal, dental, and soft tissue effects caused by herbst and mandibular protraction appliances in the treatment of mandibular Class II malocclusions.
    Alves PF, Oliveira AG.
    World J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 9(1):e1-19. PubMed ID: 19641760
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The incisor-lip relationship in Herbst/multibracket appliance treatment of Class II, Division 2 malocclusions.
    Schweitzer M, Pancherz H.
    Angle Orthod; 2001 Oct; 71(5):358-63. PubMed ID: 11605869
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Dentoskeletal effects of the Bite-Jumping Appliance and the Twin-Block Appliance in the treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial.
    Burhan AS, Nawaya FR.
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Jun; 37(3):330-7. PubMed ID: 25296729
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Skeletal Class II treatment with Twin Force Bite Corrector: case reports.
    Altuğ-Ataç AT, Dalcı ÖN, Memikoğlu UT.
    World J Orthod; 2008 Jun; 9(3):e7-17. PubMed ID: 19641763
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Vertical dentofacial changes during Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation.
    Pancherz H.
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1982 Jun; 15():189-96. PubMed ID: 6963773
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation.
    Pancherz H.
    Am J Orthod; 1982 Aug; 82(2):104-13. PubMed ID: 6961781
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Stepwise advancement Herbst appliance versus mandibular sagittal split osteotomy. Treatment effects and long-term stability of adult Class II patients.
    Chaiyongsirisern A, Rabie AB, Wong RW.
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Nov; 79(6):1084-94. PubMed ID: 19852598
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effectiveness of incremental vs maximum bite advancement during Herbst appliance therapy in late adolescent and young adult patients.
    Amuk NG, Baysal A, Coskun R, Kurt G.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Jan; 155(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 30591165
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 31.