These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

930 related items for PubMed ID: 19581032

  • 1. Cuspal deflection, strain and microleakage of endodontically treated premolar teeth restored with direct resin composites.
    Taha NA, Palamara JE, Messer HH.
    J Dent; 2009 Sep; 37(9):724-30. PubMed ID: 19581032
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Influence of resin-based composite restoration technique and endodontic access on cuspal deflection and cervical microleakage scores.
    El-Helali R, Dowling AH, McGinley EL, Duncan HF, Fleming GJ.
    J Dent; 2013 Mar; 41(3):216-22. PubMed ID: 23142095
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Effect of fiber post and cusp coverage on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars directly restored with composite resin.
    Mohammadi N, Kahnamoii MA, Yeganeh PK, Navimipour EJ.
    J Endod; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1428-32. PubMed ID: 19801245
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Influence of cavity dimension and restoration methods on the cusp deflection of premolars in composite restoration.
    Lee MR, Cho BH, Son HH, Um CM, Lee IB.
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):288-95. PubMed ID: 16530819
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effects of bonded composites vs. amalgam on resistance to cuspal deflection for endodontically-treated premolar teeth.
    Cerutti A, Flocchini P, Madini L, Mangani F, Putignano A, Docchio F.
    Am J Dent; 2004 Aug; 17(4):295-300. PubMed ID: 15478495
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Cuspal movement and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with posterior filling materials of varying reported volumetric shrinkage values.
    Fleming GJ, Hall DP, Shortall AC, Burke FJ.
    J Dent; 2005 Feb; 33(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 15683895
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Cuspal deflection in premolar teeth restored using current composite resins with and without resin-modified glass ionomer liner.
    Karaman E, Ozgunaltay G.
    Oper Dent; 2013 Feb; 38(3):282-9. PubMed ID: 23092141
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 47.