These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

153 related items for PubMed ID: 19582654

  • 1. RECIST and WHO criteria evaluation of cervical, thoracic and abdominal lymph nodes in patients with malignant lymphoma: manual versus semi-automated measurement on standard MDCT slices.
    Keil S, Behrendt FF, Stanzel S, Suehling M, Jost E, Mühlenbruch G, Mahnken A, Günther RW, Das M.
    Rofo; 2009 Sep; 181(9):888-95. PubMed ID: 19582654
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Semi-automated measurement of hyperdense, hypodense and heterogeneous hepatic metastasis on standard MDCT slices. Comparison of semi-automated and manual measurement of RECIST and WHO criteria.
    Keil S, Behrendt FF, Stanzel S, Sühling M, Koch A, Bubenzer J, Mühlenbruch G, Mahnken AH, Günther RW, Das M.
    Eur Radiol; 2008 Nov; 18(11):2456-65. PubMed ID: 18523775
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Clinical lymph node staging--influence of slice thickness and reconstruction kernel on volumetry and RECIST measurements.
    Fabel M, Wulff A, Heckel F, Bornemann L, Freitag-Wolf S, Heller M, Biederer J, Bolte H.
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3124-30. PubMed ID: 22464844
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Analysis of the thoracic aorta using a semi-automated post processing tool.
    Entezari P, Kino A, Honarmand AR, Galizia MS, Yang Y, Collins J, Yaghmai V, Carr JC.
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Sep; 82(9):1558-64. PubMed ID: 23680155
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of manual, semi- and fully automated heart segmentation for assessing global left ventricular function in multidetector computed tomography.
    Plumhans C, Keil S, Ocklenburg C, Mühlenbruch G, Behrendt FF, Günther RW, Mahnken AH.
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Aug; 44(8):476-82. PubMed ID: 19561515
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Therapy response evaluation of malignant lymphoma in a multicenter study: comparison of manual and semiautomatic measurements in CT.
    Weßling J, Schülke C, Koch R, Kohlhase N, Wassenaar L, Mesters R, Höink AJ, D Anastasi M, Karpitschka M, Fabel M, Wulff AM, Pinto dos Santos D, Kiessling A, Graser A, Bornemann L, Dicken V, Heindel W, Buerke B.
    Rofo; 2014 Aug; 186(8):768-79. PubMed ID: 24497088
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Accuracy of liver lesion assessment using automated measurement and segmentation software in biphasic multislice CT (MSCT)].
    Puesken M, Juergens KU, Edenfeld A, Buerke B, Seifarth H, Beyer F, Suehling M, Osada N, Heindel W, Wessling J.
    Rofo; 2009 Jan; 181(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 18975251
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. MSCT follow-up in malignant lymphoma: comparison of manual linear measurements with semi-automated lymph node analysis for therapy response classification.
    Weßling J, Puesken M, Koch R, Kohlhase N, Persigehl T, Mesters R, Heindel W, Buerke B.
    Rofo; 2012 Sep; 184(9):795-804. PubMed ID: 22618478
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Semi-automated volumetric analysis of artificial lymph nodes in a phantom study.
    Fabel M, Biederer J, Jochens A, Bornemann L, Soza G, Heller M, Bolte H.
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Dec; 80(3):e451-7. PubMed ID: 21094010
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Liver lesion segmentation in MSCT: effect of slice thickness on segmentation quality, measurement precision and interobserver variability.
    Puesken M, Buerke B, Fortkamp R, Koch R, Seifarth H, Heindel W, Wessling J.
    Rofo; 2011 Apr; 183(4):372-80. PubMed ID: 21246480
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.