These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

428 related items for PubMed ID: 19584374

  • 1. Assessing surgical quality using administrative and clinical data sets: a direct comparison of the University HealthSystem Consortium Clinical Database and the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data set.
    Davenport DL, Holsapple CW, Conigliaro J.
    Am J Med Qual; 2009; 24(5):395-402. PubMed ID: 19584374
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of risk adjustment methodologies in surgical quality improvement.
    Steinberg SM, Popa MR, Michalek JA, Bethel MJ, Ellison EC.
    Surgery; 2008 Oct; 144(4):662-7; discussion 662-7. PubMed ID: 18847652
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. How best to measure surgical quality? Comparison of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Patient Safety Indicators (AHRQ-PSI) and the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) postoperative adverse events at a single institution.
    Cima RR, Lackore KA, Nehring SA, Cassivi SD, Donohue JH, Deschamps C, Vansuch M, Naessens JM.
    Surgery; 2011 Nov; 150(5):943-9. PubMed ID: 21875734
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Identification of surgical complications and deaths: an assessment of the traditional surgical morbidity and mortality conference compared with the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.
    Hutter MM, Rowell KS, Devaney LA, Sokal SM, Warshaw AL, Abbott WM, Hodin RA.
    J Am Coll Surg; 2006 Nov; 203(5):618-24. PubMed ID: 17084322
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Developing a NSQIP module to measure outcomes in children's surgical care: opportunity and challenge.
    Dillon P, Hammermeister K, Morrato E, Kempe A, Oldham K, Moss L, Marchildon M, Ziegler M, Steeger J, Rowell K, Shiloach M, Henderson W.
    Semin Pediatr Surg; 2008 May; 17(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18395663
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Successful implementation of the Department of Veterans Affairs' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in the private sector: the Patient Safety in Surgery study.
    Khuri SF, Henderson WG, Daley J, Jonasson O, Jones RS, Campbell DA, Fink AS, Mentzer RM, Neumayer L, Hammermeister K, Mosca C, Healey N, Principal Investigators of the Patient Safety in Surgery Study.
    Ann Surg; 2008 Aug; 248(2):329-36. PubMed ID: 18650645
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Use of national surgical quality improvement program data as a catalyst for quality improvement.
    Rowell KS, Turrentine FE, Hutter MM, Khuri SF, Henderson WG.
    J Am Coll Surg; 2007 Jun; 204(6):1293-300. PubMed ID: 17544087
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Informatics and the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: automated processes could replace manual record review.
    Hanauer DA, Englesbe MJ, Cowan JA, Campbell DA.
    J Am Coll Surg; 2009 Jan; 208(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 19228500
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Utility of the surgical apgar score: validation in 4119 patients.
    Regenbogen SE, Ehrenfeld JM, Lipsitz SR, Greenberg CC, Hutter MM, Gawande AA.
    Arch Surg; 2009 Jan; 144(1):30-6; discussion 37. PubMed ID: 19153322
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the Tennessee Surgical Quality Collaborative to improve surgical outcomes.
    Guillamondegui OD, Gunter OL, Hines L, Martin BJ, Gibson W, Clarke PC, Cecil WT, Cofer JB.
    J Am Coll Surg; 2012 Apr; 214(4):709-14; discussion 714-6. PubMed ID: 22265639
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of mortality risk adjustment using a clinical data algorithm (American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program) and an administrative data algorithm (Solucient) at the case level within a single institution.
    Hall BL, Hirbe M, Waterman B, Boslaugh S, Dunagan WC.
    J Am Coll Surg; 2007 Dec; 205(6):767-77. PubMed ID: 18035260
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Implementation of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: critical steps to success for surgeons and hospitals.
    Velanovich V, Rubinfeld I, Patton JH, Ritz J, Jordan J, Dulchavsky S.
    Am J Med Qual; 2009 Dec; 24(6):474-9. PubMed ID: 19584373
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 22.