These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

126 related items for PubMed ID: 1958724

  • 1. Use of the Cytobrush for concurrent cytology and chlamydia sampling: a comparison of immunofluorescence and culture for detection of chlamydia.
    Szarewski A, Pompey A, Cronin D, Bertrand J, Bradbeer C, Thin RN.
    Int J STD AIDS; 1991; 2(5):367-8. PubMed ID: 1958724
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of cotton wool swab and cytobrush for detection of chlamydial infection in women attending a genitourinary medicine clinic.
    Mandal D, Ray TK, Richmond SJ, Goorney BP, Haye KR.
    Int J STD AIDS; 1991; 2(1):49-51. PubMed ID: 2036461
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Use of the Cytobrush for concurrent endocervical cytology and chlamydia sampling.
    Szarewski A, Pompey A, Bertrand J, Bradbeer C.
    Genitourin Med; 1990 Jun; 66(3):205-7. PubMed ID: 2370065
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Screening for genital chlamydial infection in symptomatic women.
    Mittal A, Kapur S, Gupta S.
    Indian J Med Res; 1993 Jun; 98():119-23. PubMed ID: 8225447
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Epidemiological findings on Chlamydia trachomatis infections of the female genitalia. Comparison of detection methods].
    Garella D, Zotti C, Moiraghi Ruggenini A, Latino MA, Gordini G, Peretto M, Ramella A.
    G Batteriol Virol Immunol; 1984 Jun; 77(1-6):94-105. PubMed ID: 6399275
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis cervical infection: a comparison of Papanicolaou and immunofluorescent staining in smears obtained by Ayre's spatula and cytobrush.
    Maeda MY, Longatto Filho A, Santos DR, Cavaliere MJ, Shih LW, Oyafuso MS, De Andrea Filho A.
    Pathologica; 1991 Jun; 83(1083):105-9. PubMed ID: 1714070
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Screening for genital chlamydia trachomatis in female patients in a primary care setting.
    Willard MA, Edman RL.
    J Fam Pract; 1989 Jan; 28(1):97-8. PubMed ID: 2643673
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Proposed guidelines for secondary screening (rescreening) instruments for gynecologic cytology. Intersociety Working Group for Cytology Technologies.
    Acta Cytol; 1998 Jan; 42(1):273-6. PubMed ID: 9479352
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Cervico-vaginal Chlamydia trachomatis infection in pregnant adolescent and adult women. A morphologic and immunofluorescent study.
    Cavaliere MJ, Maeda MY, Shirata NK, Longatto Filho A, Shih LW, de Siqueira M, de Muelenare Correa MG, Oliveira HF.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1993 Jan; 253(4):175-82. PubMed ID: 8161251
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Opportunistic screening for Chlamydia trachomatis cervicitis: the value of cytobrush specimens for detection by PCR compared with cell culture.
    Wandall DA, Ostergaard L, Overgaard L, Worm AM, Gutschik E.
    APMIS; 1998 May; 106(5):580-4. PubMed ID: 9674896
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Evaluation of a direct fluorescent antibody test for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens. Brief report.
    Dereli D, Ertem E, Serter D, Yüce K.
    APMIS; 1991 Oct; 99(10):961-4. PubMed ID: 1930969
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Cervicovaginal cytology and the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis: a comparison with immunofluorescent results.
    Caudill JL, Humphrey SK, Goellner JR.
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1994 Oct; 11(1):20-2. PubMed ID: 7956654
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [A comparison of Clearview Chlamydia diagnostic tests and direct immunofluorescence (Chlamyset Antigen) in inflammatory gynecological diseases due to Chlamydia trachomatis].
    Borisov I, Maĭnkhard K.
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1995 Oct; 34(2):35-7. PubMed ID: 8651420
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Can a gynecologic Chlamydia trachomatis infection be diagnosed by direct observation of an endocervical plain slide?
    De Wilde RL.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Sep; 159(3):786. PubMed ID: 3048107
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Performance of microtrak direct test for Chlamydia trachomatis in a prevalence study.
    Godfrey E, Winn W, Keathley JD.
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1986 Nov; 5(4):313-6. PubMed ID: 3536276
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Limited value of two widely used enzyme immunoassays for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in women.
    Thomas BJ, MacLeod EJ, Hay PE, Horner PJ, Taylor-Robinson D.
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1994 Aug; 13(8):651-5. PubMed ID: 7813495
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Chlamydia trachomatis--studies on the reliability of its detection in Papanicolaou preparations].
    Donath EM, Schrage R, Hoyme UB.
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1985 Jun; 45(6):402-5. PubMed ID: 4018517
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of detection procedures for Chlamydia trachomatis, including enzyme immunoassays, in a mouse model of genital infection.
    Taylor-Robinson D, Tuffrey M.
    J Med Microbiol; 1987 Sep; 24(2):169-73. PubMed ID: 2958630
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Detection of endocervical chlamydia infections by comparing the Papanicolaou staining test and direct immunofluorescence].
    Sánchez Mejía RM, Echániz Aviles G, Olvera Salinas J, Hernández Nevarez P, Calderón Jaimes E, Mejía Gómez C.
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1989 Feb; 57():29-36. PubMed ID: 2486964
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.