These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1724 related items for PubMed ID: 19590115

  • 41. Amorphous silicon, flat-panel, x-ray detector versus storage phosphor-based computed radiography: contrast-detail phantom study at different tube voltages and detector entrance doses.
    Hamer OW, Völk M, Zorger Z, Feuerbach S, Strotzer M.
    Invest Radiol; 2003 Apr; 38(4):212-20. PubMed ID: 12649645
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42. An image quality comparison of standard and dual-side read CR systems for pediatric radiology.
    Monnin P, Holzer Z, Wolf R, Neitzel U, Vock P, Gudinchet F, Verdun FR.
    Med Phys; 2006 Feb; 33(2):411-20. PubMed ID: 16532949
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43. Impact of additive noise on system performance of a digital X-ray imaging system.
    Zhang D, Rong J, Chen WR, Gao F, Xu K, Wu X, Liu H.
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Jan; 54(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 17260857
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44. Measurement of the modulation transfer function of digital X-ray detectors with an opaque edge-test device.
    Illers H, Buhr E, Günther-Kohfahl S, Neitzel U.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Jan; 114(1-3):214-9. PubMed ID: 15933111
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45. Dose efficiency and low-contrast detectability of an amorphous silicon x-ray detector for digital radiography.
    Aufrichtig R, Xue P.
    Phys Med Biol; 2000 Sep; 45(9):2653-69. PubMed ID: 11008963
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46. Effects of radiographic techniques on the low-contrast detail detectability performance of digital radiography systems.
    Alsleem H, U P, Mong KS, Davidson R.
    Radiol Technol; 2014 Sep; 85(6):614-22. PubMed ID: 25002641
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47. A model for image formation and image quality prediction in diagnostic radiology.
    Kandarakis I, Cavouras D, Koutsourakis C, Triantis D, Bakas A, Panayiotakis G, Nomicos C.
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1997 Sep; 43 Pt B():517-21. PubMed ID: 10179719
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48. Effect of X-ray tube parameters, iodine concentration, and patient size on image quality in pulmonary computed tomography angiography: a chest-phantom-study.
    Szucs-Farkas Z, Verdun FR, von Allmen G, Mini RL, Vock P.
    Invest Radiol; 2008 Jun; 43(6):374-81. PubMed ID: 18496042
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of routinely postprocessed (CLEAR) CE-MRA data sets: are SNR and CNR calculations reliable?
    Buerke B, Allkemper T, Kugel H, Bremer C, Evers S, Kooijman H, Heindel W, Tombach B.
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Sep; 15(9):1111-7. PubMed ID: 18692751
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50. An investigation of automatic exposure control calibration for chest imaging with a computed radiography system.
    Moore CS, Wood TJ, Avery G, Balcam S, Needler L, Beavis AW, Saunderson JR.
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 May 07; 59(9):2307-24. PubMed ID: 24732020
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51. Doses under automatic exposure control (AEC) for direct digital radiographic (DDR) X-ray systems.
    Bowden L, Faulkner R, Clancy C, Gallagher A, Devine M, Gorman D, O'Reilly G, Dowling A.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep 07; 147(1-2):210-4. PubMed ID: 21937592
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52. Multidetector computed tomography chest examinations with low-kilovoltage protocols in adults: effect on image quality and radiation dose.
    Kim MJ, Park CH, Choi SJ, Hwang KH, Kim HS.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009 Sep 07; 33(3):416-21. PubMed ID: 19478637
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53. Contrast-to-noise ratios of different elements in digital mammography: evaluation of their potential as new contrast agents.
    Diekmann F, Sommer A, Lawaczeck R, Diekmann S, Pietsch H, Speck U, Hamm B, Bick U.
    Invest Radiol; 2007 May 07; 42(5):319-25. PubMed ID: 17414528
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54. Generalizing the MTF and DQE to include x-ray scatter and focal spot unsharpness: application to a new microangiographic system.
    Kyprianou IS, Rudin S, Bednarek DR, Hoffmann KR.
    Med Phys; 2005 Feb 07; 32(2):613-26. PubMed ID: 15789608
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55. A quantitative image quality comparison of four different image guided radiotherapy devices.
    Stützel J, Oelfke U, Nill S.
    Radiother Oncol; 2008 Jan 07; 86(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 18031854
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56. Radiographic and fluoroscopic X-ray systems: Quality control of the X-ray tube and automatic exposure control using theoretical spectra to determine air kerma and dose to a homogenous phantom.
    Konst B, Nøtthellen J, Bilet E, Båth M.
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Aug 07; 22(8):204-218. PubMed ID: 34196461
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57. Computed tomography with energy-resolved detection: a feasibility study.
    Shikhaliev PM.
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Mar 07; 53(5):1475-95. PubMed ID: 18296774
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58. Are exposure index values consistent in clinical practice? A multi-manufacturer investigation.
    Butler ML, Rainford L, Last J, Brennan PC.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Mar 07; 139(1-3):371-4. PubMed ID: 20223849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59. Solid-state, flat-panel, digital radiography detectors and their physical imaging characteristics.
    Cowen AR, Kengyelics SM, Davies AG.
    Clin Radiol; 2008 May 07; 63(5):487-98. PubMed ID: 18374710
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60. Technical characterization of five x-ray detectors for paediatric radiography applications.
    Marshall NW, Smet M, Hofmans M, Pauwels H, De Clercq T, Bosmans H.
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Nov 21; 62(24):N573-N586. PubMed ID: 29064378
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 87.