These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

340 related items for PubMed ID: 19595577

  • 1. AHRQ series paper 5: grading the strength of a body of evidence when comparing medical interventions--agency for healthcare research and quality and the effective health-care program.
    Owens DK, Lohr KN, Atkins D, Treadwell JR, Reston JT, Bass EB, Chang S, Helfand M.
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 May; 63(5):513-23. PubMed ID: 19595577
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. AHRQ series paper 1: comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the effective health-care program.
    Slutsky J, Atkins D, Chang S, Sharp BA.
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 May; 63(5):481-3. PubMed ID: 18834715
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Grading the strength of a body of evidence when assessing health care interventions: an EPC update.
    Berkman ND, Lohr KN, Ansari MT, Balk EM, Kane R, McDonagh M, Morton SC, Viswanathan M, Bass EB, Butler M, Gartlehner G, Hartling L, McPheeters M, Morgan LC, Reston J, Sista P, Whitlock E, Chang S.
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Nov; 68(11):1312-24. PubMed ID: 25721570
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. AHRQ series commentary 1: rating the evidence in comparative effectiveness reviews.
    Falck-Ytter Y, Schünemann H, Guyatt G.
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 May; 63(5):474-5. PubMed ID: 20189352
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE, Kleijnen J.
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Assessing applicability when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program.
    Atkins D, Chang SM, Gartlehner G, Buckley DI, Whitlock EP, Berliner E, Matchar D.
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Nov; 64(11):1198-207. PubMed ID: 21463926
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Finding evidence for comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program.
    Relevo R, Balshem H.
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Nov; 64(11):1168-77. PubMed ID: 21684115
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. AHRQ series paper 2: principles for developing guidance: AHRQ and the effective health-care program.
    Helfand M, Balshem H.
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 May; 63(5):484-90. PubMed ID: 19716268
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. GRADE system: new paradigm.
    Terracciano L, Brozek J, Compalati E, Schünemann H.
    Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol; 2010 Aug; 10(4):377-83. PubMed ID: 20610980
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L, Datta S, Smith HS, Hirsch JA.
    Pain Physician; 2009 Aug; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. AHRQ series commentary 3: the United States addresses comparative effectiveness but not cost-effectiveness through the effective health-care program.
    Freemantle N, Drummond MF.
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 May; 63(5):479-80. PubMed ID: 20346862
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Grading of evidence of the effectiveness of health promotion interventions.
    Tang KC, Choi BC, Beaglehole R.
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2008 Sep; 62(9):832-4. PubMed ID: 18701736
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. GRADE guidelines: a new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.
    Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Schünemann HJ, Tugwell P, Knottnerus A.
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Apr; 64(4):380-2. PubMed ID: 21185693
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines: Part 2 of 3. The GRADE approach to grading quality of evidence about diagnostic tests and strategies.
    Brozek JL, Akl EA, Jaeschke R, Lang DM, Bossuyt P, Glasziou P, Helfand M, Ueffing E, Alonso-Coello P, Meerpohl J, Phillips B, Horvath AR, Bousquet J, Guyatt GH, Schünemann HJ, GRADE Working Group.
    Allergy; 2009 Aug; 64(8):1109-16. PubMed ID: 19489757
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Observational studies in systematic [corrected] reviews of comparative effectiveness: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program.
    Norris SL, Atkins D, Bruening W, Fox S, Johnson E, Kane R, Morton SC, Oremus M, Ospina M, Randhawa G, Schoelles K, Shekelle P, Viswanathan M.
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Nov; 64(11):1178-86. PubMed ID: 21636246
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines part 3 of 3. The GRADE approach to developing recommendations.
    Brożek JL, Akl EA, Compalati E, Kreis J, Terracciano L, Fiocchi A, Ueffing E, Andrews J, Alonso-Coello P, Meerpohl JJ, Lang DM, Jaeschke R, Williams JW, Phillips B, Lethaby A, Bossuyt P, Glasziou P, Helfand M, Watine J, Afilalo M, Welch V, Montedori A, Abraha I, Horvath AR, Bousquet J, Guyatt GH, Schünemann HJ, GRADE Working Group.
    Allergy; 2011 May; 66(5):588-95. PubMed ID: 21241318
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.