These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


426 related items for PubMed ID: 19606824

  • 1. Dynamic linear response theory for conformational relaxation of proteins.
    Essiz SG, Coalson RD.
    J Phys Chem B; 2009 Aug 06; 113(31):10859-69. PubMed ID: 19606824
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Modeling protein-small molecule interactions: structure and thermodynamics of noble gases binding in a cavity in mutant phage T4 lysozyme L99A.
    Mann G, Hermans J.
    J Mol Biol; 2000 Sep 29; 302(4):979-89. PubMed ID: 10993736
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Response of rotation-translation blocked proteins using Langevin dynamics on a locally harmonic landscape.
    Manson AC, Coalson RD.
    J Phys Chem B; 2012 Oct 11; 116(40):12142-58. PubMed ID: 22924611
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Linear response theory in dihedral angle space for protein structural change upon ligand binding.
    Omori S, Fuchigami S, Ikeguchi M, Kidera A.
    J Comput Chem; 2009 Dec 11; 30(16):2602-8. PubMed ID: 19373827
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Nonequilibrium, multiple-timescale simulations of ligand-receptor interactions in structured protein systems.
    Zhang Y, Peters MH, Li Y.
    Proteins; 2003 Aug 15; 52(3):339-48. PubMed ID: 12866048
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Atomic force microscopy: determination of unbinding force, off rate and energy barrier for protein-ligand interaction.
    Lee CK, Wang YM, Huang LS, Lin S.
    Micron; 2007 Aug 15; 38(5):446-61. PubMed ID: 17015017
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Selected-fit versus induced-fit protein binding: kinetic differences and mutational analysis.
    Weikl TR, von Deuster C.
    Proteins; 2009 Apr 15; 75(1):104-10. PubMed ID: 18798570
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Fragment-based computation of binding free energies by systematic sampling.
    Clark M, Meshkat S, Talbot GT, Carnevali P, Wiseman JS.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Aug 15; 49(8):1901-13. PubMed ID: 19610599
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Size versus polarizability in protein-ligand interactions: binding of noble gases within engineered cavities in phage T4 lysozyme.
    Quillin ML, Breyer WA, Griswold IJ, Matthews BW.
    J Mol Biol; 2000 Sep 29; 302(4):955-77. PubMed ID: 10993735
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Calculation of absolute protein-ligand binding free energy using distributed replica sampling.
    Rodinger T, Howell PL, Pomès R.
    J Chem Phys; 2008 Oct 21; 129(15):155102. PubMed ID: 19045232
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Atomistic simulation combined with analytic theory to study the response of the P-selectin/PSGL-1 complex to an external force.
    Gunnerson KN, Pereverzev YV, Prezhdo OV.
    J Phys Chem B; 2009 Feb 19; 113(7):2090-100. PubMed ID: 19178163
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. An evaluation of implicit and explicit solvent model systems for the molecular dynamics simulation of bacteriophage T4 lysozyme.
    Arnold GE, Ornstein RL.
    Proteins; 1994 Jan 19; 18(1):19-33. PubMed ID: 8146120
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Protein dynamic studies move to a new time slot.
    Cavanagh J, Venters RA.
    Nat Struct Biol; 2001 Nov 19; 8(11):912-4. PubMed ID: 11685230
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Computer simulations and theory of protein translocation.
    Makarov DE.
    Acc Chem Res; 2009 Feb 17; 42(2):281-9. PubMed ID: 19072704
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Grand canonical Monte Carlo simulation of ligand-protein binding.
    Clark M, Guarnieri F, Shkurko I, Wiseman J.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006 Feb 17; 46(1):231-42. PubMed ID: 16426059
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. New-generation amber united-atom force field.
    Yang L, Tan CH, Hsieh MJ, Wang J, Duan Y, Cieplak P, Caldwell J, Kollman PA, Luo R.
    J Phys Chem B; 2006 Jul 06; 110(26):13166-76. PubMed ID: 16805629
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Studying excited states of proteins by NMR spectroscopy.
    Mulder FA, Mittermaier A, Hon B, Dahlquist FW, Kay LE.
    Nat Struct Biol; 2001 Nov 06; 8(11):932-5. PubMed ID: 11685237
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Transform and relax sampling for highly anisotropic systems: application to protein domain motion and folding.
    Kitao A.
    J Chem Phys; 2011 Jul 28; 135(4):045101. PubMed ID: 21806159
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Theoretical aspects of the biological catch bond.
    Prezhdo OV, Pereverzev YV.
    Acc Chem Res; 2009 Jun 16; 42(6):693-703. PubMed ID: 19331389
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Revealing time bunching effect in single-molecule enzyme conformational dynamics.
    Lu HP.
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2011 Apr 21; 13(15):6734-49. PubMed ID: 21409227
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 22.