These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
279 related items for PubMed ID: 19608436
1. Chemical shift MRI: is there any contribution to morphologic evaluation of solid breast masses? Gokalp G, Topal U, Bolca N, Ercan I. Acad Radiol; 2009 Oct; 16(10):1263-71. PubMed ID: 19608436 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in the differential diagnosis of adrenal adenomas and malignant adrenal masses. Inan N, Arslan A, Akansel G, Anik Y, Balci NC, Demirci A. Eur J Radiol; 2008 Jan; 65(1):154-62. PubMed ID: 17466481 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Angle between 1 and 4 min gives the most significant difference in time-intensity curves between benign disease and breast cancer: analysis of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in 103 patients with breast lesions. Hara M, Watanabe T, Okumura A, Kato K, Mohri N, Ishikawa M, Mizuno A, Takeyama H. Clin Imaging; 2009 Jan; 33(5):335-42. PubMed ID: 19712811 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A combined high temporal and high spatial resolution 3 Tesla MR imaging protocol for the assessment of breast lesions: initial results. Pinker K, Grabner G, Bogner W, Gruber S, Szomolanyi P, Trattnig S, Heinz-Peer G, Weber M, Fitzal F, Pluschnig U, Rudas M, Helbich T. Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):553-8. PubMed ID: 19652611 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of suspicious nipple discharge by magnetic resonance mammography based on breast imaging reporting and data system magnetic resonance imaging descriptors. Tokuda Y, Kuriyama K, Nakamoto A, Choi S, Yutani K, Kunitomi Y, Haneda T, Kawai M, Masuda N, Takeda M, Nakamura H. J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009 Sep; 33(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 19188786 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Malignant spiculated breast masses: dynamic contrast enhanced MR (DCE-MR) imaging enhancement characteristics and histopathological correlation. Gokalp G, Topal U, Yildirim N, Tolunay S. Eur J Radiol; 2012 Feb; 81(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 21236612 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: Lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images. Yabuuchi H, Matsuo Y, Okafuji T, Kamitani T, Soeda H, Setoguchi T, Sakai S, Hatakenaka M, Kubo M, Sadanaga N, Yamamoto H, Honda H. J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 28(5):1157-65. PubMed ID: 18972357 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Breast MRI: Are T2 IR sequences useful in the evaluation of breast lesions? Ballesio L, Savelli S, Angeletti M, Porfiri LM, D'Ambrosio I, Maggi C, Castro ED, Bennati P, Fanelli GP, Vestri AR, Manganaro L. Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jul; 71(1):96-101. PubMed ID: 18479866 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Fat suppression with spectrally selective inversion vs. high spectral and spatial resolution MRI of breast lesions: qualitative and quantitative comparisons. Fan X, Abe H, Medved M, Foxley S, Arkani S, Zamora MA, Olopade OI, Newstead GM, Karczmar GS. J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Dec; 24(6):1311-5. PubMed ID: 17096393 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Relationship between lesion size and signal enhancement on subtraction fat-suppressed MR imaging of the breast. Cheung HS, Tse GM, Lai SY, Yeung DK. Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Nov; 22(9):1259-64. PubMed ID: 15607097 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of dynamic phase subtraction (DPS) map in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast. Ogura A, Hayakawa K, Yoshida S, Maeda F, Saeki F, Syukutani A. J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011 Nov; 35(6):749-52. PubMed ID: 22082548 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Whole-body MRI of multiple myeloma: comparison of different MRI sequences in assessment of different growth patterns. Weininger M, Lauterbach B, Knop S, Pabst T, Kenn W, Hahn D, Beissert M. Eur J Radiol; 2009 Feb; 69(2):339-45. PubMed ID: 18096344 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of three different software systems in the evaluation of dynamic MRI of the breast. Kurz KD, Steinhaus D, Klar V, Cohnen M, Wittsack HJ, Saleh A, Mödder U, Blondin D. Eur J Radiol; 2009 Feb; 69(2):300-7. PubMed ID: 18060715 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Characterization of breast lesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological and kinetic analysis: comparison with conventional mammography and high-resolution ultrasound. Vassiou K, Kanavou T, Vlychou M, Poultsidi A, Athanasiou E, Arvanitis DL, Fezoulidis IV. Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 18295425 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Diffusion weighted imaging in breast MRI: comparison of two different pulse sequences. Wenkel E, Geppert C, Schulz-Wendtland R, Uder M, Kiefer B, Bautz W, Janka R. Acad Radiol; 2007 Sep; 14(9):1077-83. PubMed ID: 17707315 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnosis of breast tumors by contrast-enhanced MR imaging: comparison between the diagnostic performance of dynamic enhancement patterns and morphologic features. Goto M, Ito H, Akazawa K, Kubota T, Kizu O, Yamada K, Nishimura T. J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Jan; 25(1):104-12. PubMed ID: 17152054 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The challenge of imaging dense breast parenchyma: is magnetic resonance mammography the technique of choice? A comparative study with x-ray mammography and whole-breast ultrasound. Pediconi F, Catalano C, Roselli A, Dominelli V, Cagioli S, Karatasiou A, Pronio A, Kirchin MA, Passariello R. Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):412-21. PubMed ID: 19448554 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MRI for characterizing intratesticular mass lesions. Tsili AC, Argyropoulou MI, Astrakas LG, Ntoulia EA, Giannakis D, Sofikitis N, Tsampoulas K. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Mar; 200(3):578-85. PubMed ID: 23436847 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of gadoteric acid and gadobutrol for detection as well as morphologic and dynamic characterization of lesions on breast dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Renz DM, Durmus T, Böttcher J, Taupitz M, Diekmann F, Huppertz A, Pfeil A, Maurer MH, Streitparth F, Bick U, Hamm B, Fallenberg EM. Invest Radiol; 2014 Jul; 49(7):474-84. PubMed ID: 24637587 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Characterization of breast cancer types by texture analysis of magnetic resonance images. Holli K, Lääperi AL, Harrison L, Luukkaala T, Toivonen T, Ryymin P, Dastidar P, Soimakallio S, Eskola H. Acad Radiol; 2010 Feb; 17(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 19945302 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]