These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

2132 related items for PubMed ID: 19615586

  • 21. An in vitro and in vivo evaluation of bioactive titanium implants following sodium removal treatment.
    Fawzy AS, Amer MA.
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 18585776
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Biomimetic calcium phosphate composite coating of dental implants.
    Schliephake H, Scharnweber D, Roesseler S, Dard M, Sewing A, Aref A.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006 Jan; 21(5):738-46. PubMed ID: 17066635
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Hydroxyapatite and collagen combination-coated dental implants display better bone formation in the peri-implant area than the same combination plus bone morphogenetic protein-2-coated implants, hydroxyapatite only coated implants, and uncoated implants.
    Lee SW, Hahn BD, Kang TY, Lee MJ, Choi JY, Kim MK, Kim SG.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 72(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 24331565
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Oxidized titanium screws coated with calcium ions and their performance in rabbit bone.
    Sul YT, Johansson CB, Albrektsson T.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002 Jan; 17(5):625-34. PubMed ID: 12381062
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Histomorphometric analysis of the bone-implant contact obtained with 4 different implant surface treatments placed side by side in the dog mandible.
    Novaes AB, Souza SL, de Oliveira PT, Souza AM.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002 Jan; 17(3):377-83. PubMed ID: 12074453
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Characterization of the surface properties of commercially available dental implants using scanning electron microscopy, focused ion beam, and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy.
    Jarmar T, Palmquist A, Brånemark R, Hermansson L, Engqvist H, Thomsen P.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Mar; 10(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 18254738
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Early bone healing around 2 different experimental, HA grit-blasted, and dual acid-etched titanium implant surfaces. A pilot study in rabbits.
    Gobbato L, Arguello E, Martin IS, Hawley CE, Griffin TJ.
    Implant Dent; 2012 Dec; 21(6):454-60. PubMed ID: 23149502
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Effects of a cell adhesion molecule coating on the blasted surface of titanium implants on bone healing in the rabbit femur.
    Park JW, Lee SG, Choi BJ, Suh JY.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007 Dec; 22(4):533-41. PubMed ID: 17929513
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Biomechanical comparison of biomimetically and electrochemically deposited hydroxyapatite-coated porous titanium implants.
    Yang GL, He FM, Hu JA, Wang XX, Zhao SF.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Feb; 68(2):420-7. PubMed ID: 20116717
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Histomorphometric analyses of bone interface with titanium-aluminum-vanadium and hydroxyapatite-coated implants by biomimetic process.
    Zagury R, Harari ND, Conz MB, Soares Gde A, Vidigal GM.
    Implant Dent; 2007 Sep; 16(3):290-6. PubMed ID: 17846545
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Hot isostatic pressing-processed hydroxyapatite-coated titanium implants: light microscopic and scanning electron microscopy investigations.
    Wie H, Herø H, Solheim T.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998 Sep; 13(6):837-44. PubMed ID: 9857595
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Which surface properties enhance bone response to implants? Comparison of oxidized magnesium, TiUnite, and Osseotite implant surfaces.
    Sul YT, Johansson C, Albrektsson T.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006 Sep; 19(4):319-28. PubMed ID: 16900812
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Osseointegration of titanium implants with a roughened surface containing hydride ion in a rabbit model.
    Cheng Z, Zhang F, He F, Zhang L, Guo C, Zhao S, Yang G.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jul; 110(1):e5-12. PubMed ID: 20610295
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Osseointegration of zirconia implants with different surface characteristics: an evaluation in rabbits.
    Hoffmann O, Angelov N, Zafiropoulos GG, Andreana S.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012 Jul; 27(2):352-8. PubMed ID: 22442775
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Comparison of removal torques for laser-treated titanium implants with anodized implants.
    Kang SH, Cho SA.
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 22(4):1491-5. PubMed ID: 21778844
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Comparison between bioactive fluoride modified and bioinert anodically oxidized implant surfaces in early bone response using rabbit tibia model.
    Choi JY, Lee HJ, Jang JU, Yeo IS.
    Implant Dent; 2012 Apr; 21(2):124-8. PubMed ID: 22382750
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. The effects of ion beam-assisted deposition of hydroxyapatite on the grit-blasted surface of endosseous implants in rabbit tibiae.
    Park YS, Yi KY, Lee IS, Han CH, Jung YC.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005 Apr; 20(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 15747671
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Trabecular bone response to titanium implants with a thin carbonate-containing apatite coating applied using the molecular precursor method.
    Hayakawa T, Takahashi K, Yoshinari M, Okada H, Yamamoto H, Sato M, Nemoto K.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006 Apr; 21(6):851-8. PubMed ID: 17190294
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 107.