These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

175 related items for PubMed ID: 19615608

  • 1. Sensitivity, changeover responses, and choice in transition.
    Jiménez AA, Aparicio CF.
    Behav Processes; 2009 Sep; 82(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 19615608
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Gestational exposure to methylmercury retards choice in transition in aging rats.
    Newland MC, Reile PA, Langston JL.
    Neurotoxicol Teratol; 2004 Sep; 26(2):179-94. PubMed ID: 15019952
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Dynamics of choice and frequency of environment change.
    Aparicio CF.
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jun; 78(2):165-72. PubMed ID: 18406077
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Modeling the dynamics of choice.
    Baum WM, Davison M.
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 19429211
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Fix and sample with rats in the dynamics of choice.
    Aparicio CF, Baum WM.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Jul; 86(1):43-63. PubMed ID: 16903492
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Haloperidol, dynamics of choice, and the parameters of the matching law.
    Aparicio CF.
    Behav Processes; 2007 Jun; 75(2):206-12. PubMed ID: 17398038
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Effects of lesions of the orbitofrontal cortex on sensitivity to delayed and probabilistic reinforcement.
    Mobini S, Body S, Ho MY, Bradshaw CM, Szabadi E, Deakin JF, Anderson IM.
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2002 Mar; 160(3):290-8. PubMed ID: 11889498
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Choice in a variable environment: every reinforcer counts.
    Davison M, Baum WM.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 Jul; 74(1):1-24. PubMed ID: 10966094
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Investigations of timing during the schedule and reinforcement intervals with wheel-running reinforcement.
    Belke TW, Christie-Fougere MM.
    Behav Processes; 2006 Nov 01; 73(3):240-7. PubMed ID: 16844324
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Human performance on a two-alternative rapid-acquisition choice task.
    Lie C, Harper DN, Hunt M.
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun 01; 81(2):244-9. PubMed ID: 19015013
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Human choice behaviour in a frequently changing environment.
    Krägeloh CU, Zapanta AE, Shepherd D, Landon J.
    Behav Processes; 2010 Jan 01; 83(1):119-26. PubMed ID: 19941940
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Effect of central 5-hydroxytryptamine depletion on changeover behaviour in concurrent schedules of reinforcement.
    Al-Ruwaitea AS, Chiang TJ, Ho MY, Bradshaw CM, Szabadi E.
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1999 Jun 01; 144(3):264-71. PubMed ID: 10435393
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Reinforcer concentration effects on a fixed-interval schedule.
    Blomeley FJ, Lowe CF, Wearden JH.
    Behav Processes; 2004 Jul 30; 67(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 15182926
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Concurrent-schedule performance in transition: changeover delays and signaled reinforcer ratios.
    Krägeloh CU, Davison M.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Jan 30; 79(1):87-109. PubMed ID: 12696743
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The matching law and effects of reinforcer rate and magnitude on choice in transition.
    Kyonka EG.
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jun 30; 78(2):210-6. PubMed ID: 18243576
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Human choice on concurrent variable-interval variable-ratio schedules.
    Silberberg A, Thomas JR, Berendzen N.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Nov 30; 56(3):575-84. PubMed ID: 1774545
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Steady-state choice between four alternatives obeys the constant-ratio rule.
    Bensemann J, Lobb B, Podlesnik CA, Elliffe D.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Jul 30; 104(1):7-19. PubMed ID: 25989016
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Sensitivity to relative reinforcer rate in concurrent schedules: independence from relative and absolute reinforcer duration.
    McLean AP, Blampied NM.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Jan 30; 75(1):25-42. PubMed ID: 11256865
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Every reinforcer counts: reinforcer magnitude and local preference.
    Davison M, Baum WM.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Jul 30; 80(1):95-129. PubMed ID: 13677611
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Response allocation in a rapid-acquisition concurrent-chains procedure: effects of overall terminal-link duration.
    Christensen DR, Grace RC.
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun 30; 81(2):233-7. PubMed ID: 19429217
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.