These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1558 related items for PubMed ID: 19617601

  • 41. Use of Impella Recover 2.5 left ventricular assist device in patients with cardiogenic shock or undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention procedures: experience of a high-volume center.
    Vecchio S, Chechi T, Giuliani G, Lilli A, Consoli L, Spaziani G, Giannotti F, Margheri M.
    Minerva Cardioangiol; 2008 Aug; 56(4):391-9. PubMed ID: 18614983
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42. Initial experience with miniature axial flow ventricular assist devices for postcardiotomy heart failure.
    Jurmann MJ, Siniawski H, Erb M, Drews T, Hetzer R.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2004 May; 77(5):1642-7. PubMed ID: 15111158
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43. Role of prophylactic intra-aortic balloon pump in high-risk patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Mishra S, Chu WW, Torguson R, Wolfram R, Deible R, Suddath WO, Pichard AD, Satler LF, Kent KM, Waksman R.
    Am J Cardiol; 2006 Sep 01; 98(5):608-12. PubMed ID: 16923445
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44. Safety and efficacy of mechanical circulatory support with Impella or intra-aortic balloon pump for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention and/or cardiogenic shock: Insights from a network meta-analysis of randomized trials.
    Kuno T, Takagi H, Ando T, Kodaira M, Numasawa Y, Fox J, Bangalore S.
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Apr 01; 97(5):E636-E645. PubMed ID: 32894797
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45. Current status of percutaneous ventricular assist devices for cardiogenic shock.
    Basra SS, Loyalka P, Kar B.
    Curr Opin Cardiol; 2011 Nov 01; 26(6):548-54. PubMed ID: 21926617
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46. Impact of intra-aortic balloon pump support initiated before versus after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with cardiogenic shock from acute myocardial infarction.
    Cheng JM, van Leeuwen MA, de Boer SP, Wai MC, den Uil CA, Jewbali LS, van Geuns RJ, Kardys I, van Domburg RT, Boersma E, Zijlstra F, Akkerhuis KM.
    Int J Cardiol; 2013 Oct 09; 168(4):3758-63. PubMed ID: 23830073
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47. [Mechanical circulatory support. 1: Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP)].
    Borowski A, Ruhparwar A, Korb H.
    Zentralbl Chir; 1995 Oct 09; 120(3):159-65. PubMed ID: 7754716
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48. The efficacy and safety of mechanical hemodynamic support in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention with or without cardiogenic shock: Bayesian approach network meta-analysis of 13 randomized controlled trials.
    Lee JM, Park J, Kang J, Jeon KH, Jung JH, Lee SE, Han JK, Kim HL, Yang HM, Park KW, Kang HJ, Koo BK, Kim SH, Kim HS.
    Int J Cardiol; 2015 Apr 01; 184():36-46. PubMed ID: 25697869
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49. Impella Support Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: A Meta-Analysis.
    Moustafa A, Khan MS, Saad M, Siddiqui S, Eltahawy E.
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2022 Jan 01; 34():25-31. PubMed ID: 33549497
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50. Mechanical versus pharmacologic support for cardiogenic shock.
    Dhar G, Jolly N.
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Mar 01; 75(4):626-9. PubMed ID: 20049971
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51. Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiogenic Shock.
    Mandawat A, Rao SV.
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 May 01; 10(5):. PubMed ID: 28500136
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52. Percutaneous assist devices vs. intra-aortic balloon pump for cardiogenic shock: evidence under construction vs. expert opinion.
    Engström AE, Sjauw KD, Henriques JP.
    Eur Heart J; 2010 Feb 01; 31(4):502; author reply 502-3. PubMed ID: 19952005
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53. Intra-aortic balloon pump trials: questions, answers, and unresolved issues.
    Perera D, Lumley M, Pijls N, Patel MR.
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jun 01; 6(3):317-21. PubMed ID: 23780295
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54. Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.
    Thiele H, Smalling RW, Schuler GC.
    Eur Heart J; 2007 Sep 01; 28(17):2057-63. PubMed ID: 17586541
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55. Impella Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
    Schrage B, Ibrahim K, Loehn T, Werner N, Sinning JM, Pappalardo F, Pieri M, Skurk C, Lauten A, Landmesser U, Westenfeld R, Horn P, Pauschinger M, Eckner D, Twerenbold R, Nordbeck P, Salinger T, Abel P, Empen K, Busch MC, Felix SB, Sieweke JT, Møller JE, Pareek N, Hill J, MacCarthy P, Bergmann MW, Henriques JPS, Möbius-Winkler S, Schulze PC, Ouarrak T, Zeymer U, Schneider S, Blankenberg S, Thiele H, Schäfer A, Westermann D.
    Circulation; 2019 Mar 05; 139(10):1249-1258. PubMed ID: 30586755
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56. What is the evidence for IABP in STEMI with and without cardiogenic shock?
    de Waha S, Desch S, Eitel I, Fuernau G, Lurz P, de Waha A, Schuler G, Thiele H.
    Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis; 2012 Jun 05; 6(3):123-32. PubMed ID: 22569335
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57. Percutaneous ventricular assist device support during off-pump surgical coronary revascularization.
    Gregoric ID, Poglajen G, Span M, Frazier OH, Loyalka P, Kar B.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2008 Aug 05; 86(2):637-9. PubMed ID: 18640347
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58. Mechanical circulatory support with the Impella® LP5.0 pump and an intra-aortic balloon pump for cardiogenic shock in acute myocardial infarction: The IMPELLA-STIC randomized study.
    Bochaton T, Huot L, Elbaz M, Delmas C, Aissaoui N, Farhat F, Mewton N, Bonnefoy E, IMPELLA-STIC investigators.
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2020 Apr 05; 113(4):237-243. PubMed ID: 31740272
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59. Acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: role of mechanical circulatory support.
    Aggarwal S, Slaughter MS.
    Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2008 Oct 05; 6(9):1223-35. PubMed ID: 18939910
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60. Mechanical circulatory support with Impella versus intra-aortic balloon pump or medical treatment in cardiogenic shock-a critical appraisal of current data.
    Wernly B, Seelmaier C, Leistner D, Stähli BE, Pretsch I, Lichtenauer M, Jung C, Hoppe UC, Landmesser U, Thiele H, Lauten A.
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2019 Nov 05; 108(11):1249-1257. PubMed ID: 30900010
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 78.