These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
395 related items for PubMed ID: 19617857
1. The characteristics of no-go potentials with intraepidermal stimulation. Nakata H, Sakamoto K, Inui K, Hoshiyama M, Kakigi R. Neuroreport; 2009 Aug 26; 20(13):1149-54. PubMed ID: 19617857 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The characteristics of the nogo-N140 component in somatosensory go/nogo tasks. Nakata H, Inui K, Wasaka T, Tamura Y, Kida T, Kakigi R. Neurosci Lett; 2006 Apr 24; 397(3):318-22. PubMed ID: 16406341 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative analysis of event-related potentials during Go/NoGo and CPT: decomposition of electrophysiological markers of response inhibition and sustained attention. Kirmizi-Alsan E, Bayraktaroglu Z, Gurvit H, Keskin YH, Emre M, Demiralp T. Brain Res; 2006 Aug 09; 1104(1):114-28. PubMed ID: 16824492 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A study on the neural mechanism of inhibition of return by the event-related potential in the Go/NoGo task. Tian Y, Yao D. Biol Psychol; 2008 Oct 09; 79(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 18524452 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Is N2 associated with successful suppression of behavior responses in impulse control processes? Dong G, Yang L, Hu Y, Jiang Y. Neuroreport; 2009 Apr 22; 20(6):537-42. PubMed ID: 19276864 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Characteristics of No-go-P300 component during somatosensory Go/No-go paradigms. Nakata H, Sakamoto K, Kakigi R. Neurosci Lett; 2010 Jul 12; 478(3):124-7. PubMed ID: 20452400 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Processing capacity in chronic pain patients: a visual event-related potentials study. Veldhuijzen DS, Kenemans JL, van Wijck AJ, Olivier B, Kalkman CJ, Volkerts ER. Pain; 2006 Mar 12; 121(1-2):60-8. PubMed ID: 16480825 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Sequence effects support the conflict theory of N2 and P3 in the Go/NoGo task. Smith JL, Smith EA, Provost AL, Heathcote A. Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Mar 12; 75(3):217-26. PubMed ID: 19951723 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Dysfunctional response preparation and inhibition during a visual Go/No-go task in children with two subtypes of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Johnstone SJ, Clarke AR. Psychiatry Res; 2009 Apr 30; 166(2-3):223-37. PubMed ID: 19286266 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The relationship of N2 and P3 to inhibitory processing of social drinkers in a Go/NoGo task. Oddy BW, Barry RJ. Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Jun 30; 72(3):323-30. PubMed ID: 19250950 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. On the relation of movement-related potentials to the go/no-go effect on P3. Verleger R, Paehge T, Kolev V, Yordanova J, Jaśkowski P. Biol Psychol; 2006 Oct 30; 73(3):298-313. PubMed ID: 16837117 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Task-related temporal and topographical changes of cortical activity during ultra-rapid visual categorization. Kincses TZ, Chadaide Z, Varga ET, Antal A, Paulus W. Brain Res; 2006 Sep 27; 1112(1):191-200. PubMed ID: 16928365 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]