These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

242 related items for PubMed ID: 19620427

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Initial experience with oral contrast in PET/CT: phantom and clinical studies.
    Cohade C, Osman M, Nakamoto Y, Marshall LT, Links JM, Fishman EK, Wahl RL.
    J Nucl Med; 2003 Mar; 44(3):412-6. PubMed ID: 12621008
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. PET/CT with intravenous contrast can be used for PET attenuation correction in cancer patients.
    Berthelsen AK, Holm S, Loft A, Klausen TL, Andersen F, Højgaard L.
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2005 Oct; 32(10):1167-75. PubMed ID: 15909196
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Correction of oral contrast artifacts in CT-based attenuation correction of PET images using an automated segmentation algorithm.
    Ahmadian A, Ay MR, Bidgoli JH, Sarkar S, Zaidi H.
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2008 Oct; 35(10):1812-23. PubMed ID: 18418597
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Dual-modality PET/CT scanning with negative oral contrast agent to avoid artifacts: introduction and evaluation.
    Antoch G, Kuehl H, Kanja J, Lauenstein TC, Schneemann H, Hauth E, Jentzen W, Beyer T, Goehde SC, Debatin JF.
    Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):879-85. PubMed ID: 14764889
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. MR imaging of the gastrointestinal tract with i.v., gadolinium and diluted barium oral contrast media compared with unenhanced MR imaging and CT.
    Low RN, Francis IR.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Oct; 169(4):1051-9. PubMed ID: 9308464
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Water-equivalent oral contrast agents in dual-modality PET/computed tomography scanning: does a little barium make the difference?
    Kinner S, Veit-Haibach P, Lauenstein TC, Bockisch A, Antoch G.
    Nucl Med Commun; 2009 Mar; 30(3):206-9. PubMed ID: 19262282
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Water as a contrast medium: a re-evaluation using the multidetector-row computed tomography.
    Makarawo TP, Negussie E, Malde S, Tilak J, Gayagoy J, Watson J, Francis F, Lincoln D, Jacobs MJ.
    Am Surg; 2013 Jul; 79(7):728-33. PubMed ID: 23816008
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of the effect of positive and negative oral contrast agents on (18)F-FDG PET/CT scan.
    Sun XG, Huang G, Liu JJ, Wan LR.
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2009 Jul; 12(2):115-8. PubMed ID: 19675862
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Oral contrast medium in PET/CT: should you or shouldn't you?
    Groves AM, Kayani I, Dickson JC, Townsend C, Croasdale I, Syed R, Nagabushan N, Hain SF, Ell PJ, Bomanji JB.
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2005 Oct; 32(10):1160-6. PubMed ID: 15937685
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Optimized intravenous contrast administration for diagnostic whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT.
    Beyer T, Antoch G, Bockisch A, Stattaus J.
    J Nucl Med; 2005 Mar; 46(3):429-35. PubMed ID: 15750155
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Evaluation of the effects of oral water and low-density barium sulphate suspension on bowel appearance on FDG-PET/CT.
    Blake MA, Setty BN, Cronin CG, Kalra M, Holalkere NS, Fischman AJ, Mueller PR, Sahani DV.
    Eur Radiol; 2010 Jan; 20(1):157-64. PubMed ID: 19680659
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Attenuation correction of myocardial SPECT perfusion images with low-dose CT: evaluation of the method by comparison with perfusion PET.
    Fricke E, Fricke H, Weise R, Kammeier A, Hagedorn R, Lotz N, Lindner O, Tschoepe D, Burchert W.
    J Nucl Med; 2005 May; 46(5):736-44. PubMed ID: 15872344
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Cost-effectiveness and patient tolerance of low-attenuation oral contrast material: milk versus VoLumen.
    Koo CW, Shah-Patel LR, Baer JW, Frager DH.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 May; 190(5):1307-13. PubMed ID: 18430848
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Whole-body positron emission tomography-CT: optimized CT using oral and IV contrast materials.
    Antoch G, Freudenberg LS, Stattaus J, Jentzen W, Mueller SP, Debatin JF, Bockisch A.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Dec; 179(6):1555-60. PubMed ID: 12438054
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.