These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

503 related items for PubMed ID: 19632696

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Total bone mineral content and body composition by x-ray densitometry in newborns.
    Venkataraman PS, Ahluwalia BW.
    Pediatrics; 1992 Nov; 90(5):767-70. PubMed ID: 1408552
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Assessment of human body composition using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and bioelectrical impedance analysis.
    Bolanowski M, Nilsson BE.
    Med Sci Monit; 2001 Nov; 7(5):1029-33. PubMed ID: 11535954
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. In vivo whole body and appendicular bone mineral density in rats: a dual energy X-ray absorptiometry study.
    Karahan S, Kincaid SA, Lauten SD, Wright JC.
    Comp Med; 2002 Apr; 52(2):143-51. PubMed ID: 12022394
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Body composition analysis by dual X-ray absorptiometry: in vivo and in vitro comparison of three different fan-beam instruments.
    Aasen G, Fagertun H, Halse J.
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2006 Apr; 66(8):659-66. PubMed ID: 17101558
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Precision of total-body and regional bone mineral measurement by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
    Seto H, Kageyama M, Nomura K, Kakishita M, Tonami S.
    Radiat Med; 1991 Apr; 9(3):110-3. PubMed ID: 1656486
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry versus skinfold measurements in the assessment of total body fat in renal transplant recipients.
    Hart PD, Wilkie ME, Edwards A, Cunningham J.
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 1993 May; 47(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 8319670
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Evaluation of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry as a method of measurement of body fat.
    Pritchard JE, Nowson CA, Strauss BJ, Carlson JS, Kaymakci B, Wark JD.
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 1993 Mar; 47(3):216-28. PubMed ID: 8458318
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The intra- and inter-instrument reliability of DXA based on ex vivo soft tissue measurements.
    Guo Y, Franks PW, Brookshire T, Antonio Tataranni P.
    Obes Res; 2004 Dec; 12(12):1925-9. PubMed ID: 15687392
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of total-body measurements by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and dual-photon absorptiometry.
    Nuti R, Martini G, Righi G, Frediani B, Turchetti V.
    J Bone Miner Res; 1991 Jul; 6(7):681-7. PubMed ID: 1950673
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) measurements of bone density and body composition: promise and pitfalls.
    Bachrach LK.
    J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab; 2000 Sep; 13 Suppl 2():983-8. PubMed ID: 11086651
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Body composition of growing and adult cats as measured by use of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.
    Lauten SD, Cox NR, Baker GH, Painter DJ, Morrison NE, Baker HJ.
    Comp Med; 2000 Apr; 50(2):175-83. PubMed ID: 10857009
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 26.