These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

179 related items for PubMed ID: 19632901

  • 1. Biometric assessment.
    Kiserud T, Johnsen SL.
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Dec; 23(6):819-31. PubMed ID: 19632901
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Diagnosis of IUGR: traditional biometry.
    Platz E, Newman R.
    Semin Perinatol; 2008 Jun; 32(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 18482612
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Continuous independent quality control for fetal ultrasound biometry provided by the cumulative summation technique.
    Balsyte D, Schäffer L, Burkhardt T, Wisser J, Zimmermann R, Kurmanavicius J.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Apr; 35(4):449-55. PubMed ID: 20052663
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Practical application of customised growth charts.
    Hutchon D, Anderson J.
    BJOG; 2010 Feb; 117(3):371; author reply 371-2. PubMed ID: 20078592
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Re: Customised fetal weight: centile charts or tables?
    Hutchon DJ.
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Apr; 46(2):172-3; author reply 173-4. PubMed ID: 16638047
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The impact of choice of reference charts and equations on the assessment of fetal biometry.
    Salomon LJ, Bernard JP, Duyme M, Buvat I, Ville Y.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jun; 25(6):559-65. PubMed ID: 15909324
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The World Health Organization fetal growth charts: concept, findings, interpretation, and application.
    Kiserud T, Benachi A, Hecher K, Perez RG, Carvalho J, Piaggio G, Platt LD.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 218(2S):S619-S629. PubMed ID: 29422204
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [What is the normal fetal weight?].
    Wolf H, Schaap AH.
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2009 May 02; 153(18):844-7. PubMed ID: 19475861
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Fetal biometry: relevance in obstetrical practice.
    March MI, Warsof SL, Chauhan SP.
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Mar 02; 55(1):281-7. PubMed ID: 22343244
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Fetal biometry by an inexperienced operator using two- and three-dimensional ultrasound.
    Yang F, Leung KY, Lee YP, Chan HY, Tang MH.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 May 02; 35(5):566-71. PubMed ID: 20183864
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Fetal growth: a review of terms, concepts and issues relevant to obstetrics.
    Mayer C, Joseph KS.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Feb 02; 41(2):136-45. PubMed ID: 22648955
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Dating and growth in the first trimester.
    Bottomley C, Bourne T.
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Aug 02; 23(4):439-52. PubMed ID: 19282247
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Customised assessment of fetal growth potential: implications for perinatal care.
    Gardosi J.
    Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2012 Sep 02; 97(5):F314-7. PubMed ID: 22684160
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A comparison of fetal organ measurements by echo-planar magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound.
    Duncan KR, Issa B, Moore R, Baker PN, Johnson IR, Gowland PA.
    BJOG; 2005 Jan 02; 112(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 15663396
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The customised growth potential: an international research tool to study the epidemiology of fetal growth.
    Gardosi J, Figueras F, Clausson B, Francis A.
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2011 Jan 02; 25(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 21133964
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Prenatal and postnatal determination of gestational age of small newborn infants].
    Baumann C, Hüppi P, Amato M.
    Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol; 1993 Jan 02; 197(3):135-40. PubMed ID: 8396289
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Reference charts of foetal biometry in Asians.
    Lai FM, Yeo GS.
    Singapore Med J; 1995 Dec 02; 36(6):628-36. PubMed ID: 8781636
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Evaluation of perinatal outcome using individualized growth assessment: comparison with conventional methods.
    Ariyuki Y, Hata T, Kitao M.
    Pediatrics; 1995 Jul 02; 96(1 Pt 1):36-42. PubMed ID: 7596719
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. How good is fetal weight estimation using volumetric methods?
    Siemer J, Peter W, Zollver H, Hart N, Müller A, Meurer B, Goecke T, Schild RL.
    Ultraschall Med; 2008 Aug 02; 29(4):377-82. PubMed ID: 18484061
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.