These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


1248 related items for PubMed ID: 19633460

  • 1. Biomechanical comparison of polyaxial and uniaxial locking plate fixation in a proximal tibial gap model.
    Cullen AB, Curtiss S, Lee MA.
    J Orthop Trauma; 2009 Aug; 23(7):507-13. PubMed ID: 19633460
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Biomechanical comparison of polyaxial-type locking plates and a fixed-angle locking plate for internal fixation of distal femur fractures.
    Otto RJ, Moed BR, Bledsoe JG.
    J Orthop Trauma; 2009 Oct; 23(9):645-52. PubMed ID: 19897986
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Polyaxial locking plate fixation in distal femur fractures: a biomechanical comparison.
    Wilkens KJ, Curtiss S, Lee MA.
    J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Oct; 22(9):624-8. PubMed ID: 18827592
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A biomechanical comparison of locked plate fixation with percutaneous insertion capability versus the angled blade plate in a subtrochanteric fracture gap model.
    Crist BD, Khalafi A, Hazelwood SJ, Lee MA.
    J Orthop Trauma; 2009 Oct; 23(9):622-7. PubMed ID: 19897982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Are locking screws advantageous with plate fixation of humeral shaft fractures? A biomechanical analysis of synthetic and cadaveric bone.
    O'Toole RV, Andersen RC, Vesnovsky O, Alexander M, Topoleski LD, Nascone JW, Sciadini MF, Turen C, Eglseder WA.
    J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Oct; 22(10):709-15. PubMed ID: 18978547
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Biomechanical strength of the Peri-Loc proximal tibial plate: a comparison of all-locked versus hybrid locked/nonlocked screw configurations.
    Estes C, Rhee P, Shrader MW, Csavina K, Jacofsky MC, Jacofsky DJ.
    J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Oct; 22(5):312-6. PubMed ID: 18448984
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Biomechanical comparison of proximal locking plates and blade plates for the treatment of comminuted subtrochanteric femoral fractures.
    Floyd JC, O'Toole RV, Stall A, Forward DP, Nabili M, Shillingburg D, Hsieh A, Nascone JW.
    J Orthop Trauma; 2009 Oct; 23(9):628-33. PubMed ID: 19897983
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Stabilization of the posteromedial fragment in bicondylar tibial plateau fractures: a mechanical comparison of locking and nonlocking single and dual plating methods.
    Yoo BJ, Beingessner DM, Barei DP.
    J Trauma; 2010 Jul; 69(1):148-55. PubMed ID: 20622588
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Biomechanical analysis of bicondylar tibial plateau fixation: how does lateral locking plate fixation compare to dual plate fixation?
    Higgins TF, Klatt J, Bachus KN.
    J Orthop Trauma; 2007 May; 21(5):301-6. PubMed ID: 17485994
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Biomechanical analysis of distal femur fracture fixation: fixed-angle screw-plate construct versus condylar blade plate.
    Higgins TF, Pittman G, Hines J, Bachus KN.
    J Orthop Trauma; 2007 Jan; 21(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 17211268
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Angular stability potentially permits fewer locking screws compared with conventional locking in intramedullary nailed distal tibia fractures: a biomechanical study.
    Gueorguiev B, Ockert B, Schwieger K, Wähnert D, Lawson-Smith M, Windolf M, Stoffel K.
    J Orthop Trauma; 2011 Jun; 25(6):340-6. PubMed ID: 21577069
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Effects of hybrid plating with locked and nonlocked screws on the strength of locked plating constructs in the osteoporotic diaphysis.
    Doornink J, Fitzpatrick DC, Boldhaus S, Madey SM, Bottlang M.
    J Trauma; 2010 Aug; 69(2):411-7. PubMed ID: 20699751
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Locking versus nonlocking T-plates for dorsal and volar fixation of dorsally comminuted distal radius fractures: a biomechanical study.
    Trease C, McIff T, Toby EB.
    J Hand Surg Am; 2005 Jul; 30(4):756-63. PubMed ID: 16039369
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Biomechanical comparison of double-row locking plates versus single- and double-row non-locking plates in a comminuted metacarpal fracture model.
    Gajendran VK, Szabo RM, Myo GK, Curtiss SB.
    J Hand Surg Am; 2009 Dec; 34(10):1851-8. PubMed ID: 19897325
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Fixation of extra-articular distal humerus fractures using one locking plate versus two reconstruction plates: a laboratory study.
    Tejwani NC, Murthy A, Park J, McLaurin TM, Egol KA, Kummer FJ.
    J Trauma; 2009 Mar; 66(3):795-9. PubMed ID: 19276755
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Biomechanical study of four palmar locking plates and one non-locking palmar plate for distal radius fractures: stiffness and load to failure tests in a cadaver model].
    Rudig L, Mehling I, Klitscher D, Mehler D, Prommersberger KJ, Rommens PM, Müller LP.
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2009 Jun; 54(3):150-8. PubMed ID: 19469665
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 63.