These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

299 related items for PubMed ID: 19633563

  • 1. Effects of audibility and multichannel wide dynamic range compression on consonant recognition for listeners with severe hearing loss.
    Davies-Venn E, Souza P, Brennan M, Stecker GC.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):494-504. PubMed ID: 19633563
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Improving speech audibility with wide dynamic range compression in listeners with severe sensorineural loss.
    Souza PE, Bishop RD.
    Ear Hear; 1999 Dec; 20(6):461-70. PubMed ID: 10613384
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Using multichannel wide-dynamic range compression in severely hearing-impaired listeners: effects on speech recognition and quality.
    Souza PE, Jenstad LM, Folino R.
    Ear Hear; 2005 Apr; 26(2):120-31. PubMed ID: 15809540
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Quantifying the contribution of audibility to recognition of compression-amplified speech.
    Souza PE, Turner CW.
    Ear Hear; 1999 Feb; 20(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 10037062
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The role of spectral resolution, working memory, and audibility in explaining variance in susceptibility to temporal envelope distortion.
    Davies-Venn E, Souza P.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Jun; 25(6):592-604. PubMed ID: 25313549
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. New speech tests reveal benefit of wide-dynamic-range, fast-acting compression for consonant discrimination in children with moderate-to-profound hearing loss.
    Marriage JE, Moore BC.
    Int J Audiol; 2003 Oct; 42(7):418-25. PubMed ID: 14582638
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Effects of Slow- and Fast-Acting Compression on Hearing-Impaired Listeners' Consonant-Vowel Identification in Interrupted Noise.
    Kowalewski B, Zaar J, Fereczkowski M, MacDonald EN, Strelcyk O, May T, Dau T.
    Trends Hear; 2018 Oct; 22():2331216518800870. PubMed ID: 30311552
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effect of a single-channel wide dynamic range compression circuit on perception of stop consonant place of articulation.
    Hedrick MS, Rice T.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Oct; 43(5):1174-84. PubMed ID: 11063239
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Amplification and consonant modulation spectra.
    Souza P, Gallun F.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Apr; 31(2):268-76. PubMed ID: 20071993
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effects of three amplification strategies on speech perception by children with severe and profound hearing loss.
    Marriage JE, Moore BC, Stone MA, Baer T.
    Ear Hear; 2005 Feb; 26(1):35-47. PubMed ID: 15692303
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Older listeners' use of temporal cues altered by compression amplification.
    Souza PE.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Jun; 43(3):661-74. PubMed ID: 10877436
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Speech recognition performance of patients with sensorineural hearing loss under unaided and aided conditions using linear and compression hearing AIDS.
    Shanks JE, Wilson RH, Larson V, Williams D.
    Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):280-90. PubMed ID: 12195170
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Effect of Adaptive Compression and Fast-Acting WDRC Strategies on Sentence Recognition in Noise in Mandarin-Speaking Pediatric Hearing Aid Users.
    Liu H, Liu Y, Li Y, Jin X, Li J, Zhou Y, Ge W, Ni X.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Apr; 29(4):273-278. PubMed ID: 29664721
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Effect of preferred volume setting on speech audibility in different hearing aid circuits.
    Souza PE, Kitch VJ.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2001 Sep; 12(8):415-22. PubMed ID: 11599876
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effect of slow-acting wide dynamic range compression on measures of intelligibility and ratings of speech quality in simulated-loss listeners.
    Rosengard PS, Payton KL, Braida LD.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 16197282
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Music preferences with hearing aids: effects of signal properties, compression settings, and listener characteristics.
    Croghan NB, Arehart KH, Kates JM.
    Ear Hear; 2014 Jun; 35(5):e170-84. PubMed ID: 25010635
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Effects of Reverberation and Compression on Consonant Identification in Individuals with Hearing Impairment.
    Reinhart PN, Souza PE, Srinivasan NK, Gallun FJ.
    Ear Hear; 2016 Jun; 37(2):144-52. PubMed ID: 26462171
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Improving audibility with nonlinear amplification for listeners with high-frequency loss.
    Souza PE, Bishop RD.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2000 Apr; 11(4):214-23. PubMed ID: 10783924
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Influence of Instantaneous Compression on Recognition of Speech in Noise with Temporal Dips.
    Rasetshwane DM, Raybine DA, Kopun JG, Gorga MP, Neely ST.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Jan; 30(1):16-30. PubMed ID: 30461387
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Measuring the long-term SNRs of static and adaptive compression amplification techniques for speech in noise.
    Lai YH, Li PC, Tsai KS, Chu WC, Young ST.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Sep; 24(8):671-83. PubMed ID: 24131603
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.