These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

741 related items for PubMed ID: 19634463

  • 1. The accuracy of a 3-D laser scanner for crown width measurements.
    Nouri M, Massudi R, Bagheban AA, Azimi S, Fereidooni F.
    Aust Orthod J; 2009 May; 25(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 19634463
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Validity, reliability and reproducibility of three methods used to measure tooth widths for bolton analyses.
    Naidu D, Scott J, Ong D, Ho CT.
    Aust Orthod J; 2009 Nov; 25(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 20043542
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts.
    Leifert MF, Leifert MM, Efstratiadis SS, Cangialosi TJ.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):16.e1-4; discussion 16. PubMed ID: 19577140
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A new system for scanning, measuring and analyzing dental casts based on a 3D holographic sensor.
    Redlich M, Weinstock T, Abed Y, Schneor R, Holdstein Y, Fischer A.
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2008 May; 11(2):90-5. PubMed ID: 18416750
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Accuracy of space analysis with emodels and plaster models.
    Mullen SR, Martin CA, Ngan P, Gladwin M.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):346-52. PubMed ID: 17826603
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Validity and reliability of tooth size and dental arch measurements: a stereo photogrammetric study.
    Al-Khatib AR, Rajion ZA, Masudi SM, Hassan R, Townsend GC.
    Aust Orthod J; 2012 May; 28(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 22866590
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Measurement of the buccolingual inclination of teeth: manual technique vs 3-dimensional software.
    Nouri M, Abdi AH, Farzan A, Mokhtarpour F, Baghban AA.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Oct; 146(4):522-9. PubMed ID: 25263155
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models.
    Zilberman O, Huggare JA, Parikakis KA.
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Jun; 73(3):301-6. PubMed ID: 12828439
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Three-dimensional dental measurements: An alternative to plaster models.
    El-Zanaty HM, El-Beialy AR, Abou El-Ezz AM, Attia KH, El-Bialy AR, Mostafa YA.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Feb; 137(2):259-65. PubMed ID: 20152684
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Three-dimensional imaging of orthodontic models: a pilot study.
    Asquith J, Gillgrass T, Mossey P.
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Oct; 29(5):517-22. PubMed ID: 17974542
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Mandibular permanent first molar and incisor width as predictor of mandibular canine and premolar width.
    Melgaço CA, de Sousa Araújo MT, de Oliveira Ruellas AC.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):340-5. PubMed ID: 17826602
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of the iOC intraoral scanner: a comparison of tooth widths and Bolton ratios.
    Naidu D, Freer TJ.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Aug; 144(2):304-10. PubMed ID: 23910212
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A clinical photogrammetric method to measure dental arch dimensions and mesio-distal tooth size.
    Normando D, da Silva PL, Mendes ÁM.
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):721-6. PubMed ID: 21282283
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. An analysis of maxillary anterior teeth: facial and dental proportions.
    Hasanreisoglu U, Berksun S, Aras K, Arslan I.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Dec; 94(6):530-8. PubMed ID: 16316799
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Accuracy and reproducibility of 3-dimensional digital model measurements.
    Sousa MV, Vasconcelos EC, Janson G, Garib D, Pinzan A.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Aug; 142(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 22858338
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Three-dimensional assessment of dental casts' occlusal surfaces using two impression materials.
    Tarawneh FM, Panos PG, Athanasiou AE.
    J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Nov; 35(11):821-6. PubMed ID: 18482343
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Dental models made with an intraoral scanner: a validation study.
    Cuperus AM, Harms MC, Rangel FA, Bronkhorst EM, Schols JG, Breuning KH.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Sep; 142(3):308-13. PubMed ID: 22920696
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Evaluation of distances between the mandibular teeth and the alveolar process in Brazilians with normal occlusion.
    Triviño T, Siqueira DF, Andrews WA.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Mar; 137(3):308.e1-4; discussion 308-9. PubMed ID: 20197165
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Defining new dental phenotypes using 3-D image analysis to enhance discrimination and insights into biological processes.
    Smith R, Zaitoun H, Coxon T, Karmo M, Kaur G, Townsend G, Harris EF, Brook A.
    Arch Oral Biol; 2009 Dec; 54 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S118-25. PubMed ID: 18644585
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A comparison between a new 2-dimensional digital on-screen tooth measurement method with direct measurements.
    Sonbol HN, Al-Omari IK, Duaibis RB, Saleh MW, Al-Bitar ZB.
    Saudi Med J; 2011 Sep; 32(9):895-900. PubMed ID: 21894350
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 38.