These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1100 related items for PubMed ID: 19634464

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Effects of the reciprocal mini-chin cup appliance.
    Aslan BI, Dinçer M.
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Feb; 30(1):80-8. PubMed ID: 18276929
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Skeletal and dental changes with nonextraction Begg mechanotherapy in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Reddy P, Kharbanda OP, Duggal R, Parkash H.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Dec; 118(6):641-8. PubMed ID: 11113799
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Treatment effects produced by preorthodontic trainer appliance in patients with class II division I malocclusion.
    Das UM, Reddy D.
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2010 Dec; 28(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 20215669
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Treatment effects of the R-appliance and twin block in Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Jamilian A, Showkatbakhsh R, Amiri SS.
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):354-8. PubMed ID: 20956385
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. The influence of functional orthodontics and mandibular sagittal split advancement osteotomy on dental and skeletal variables--a comparative cephalometric study.
    Lohrmann B, Schwestka-Polly R, Nägerl H, Ihlow D, Kubein-Meesenburg D.
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Dec; 28(6):553-60. PubMed ID: 17142259
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Soft tissue facial profile changes following functional appliance therapy.
    Quintão C, Helena I, Brunharo VP, Menezes RC, Almeida MA.
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Feb; 28(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 16113035
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Treatment effects of the mandibular anterior repositioning appliance on patients with Class II malocclusion.
    Pangrazio-Kulbersh V, Berger JL, Chermak DS, Kaczynski R, Simon ES, Haerian A.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):286-95. PubMed ID: 12637901
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Dentoskeletal effects of Twin Block and Herbst appliances in patients with Class II division 1 mandibular retrognathy.
    Baysal A, Uysal T.
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Apr; 36(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 24663007
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Evaluation of Class II treatment by cephalometric regional superpositions versus conventional measurements.
    Efstratiadis S, Baumrind S, Shofer F, Jacobsson-Hunt U, Laster L, Ghafari J.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Nov; 128(5):607-18. PubMed ID: 16286208
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. A cephalometric study of the Class II correction effects of the Eureka Spring.
    Stromeyer EL, Caruso JM, DeVincenzo JP.
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Jun; 72(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 12071603
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 55.