These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Do central venous catheters have advantages over arteriovenous fistulas or grafts? Quarello F, Forneris G, Borca M, Pozzato M. J Nephrol; 2006 Jun; 19(3):265-79. PubMed ID: 16874685 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Venous thrombosis in relation to central venous catheters: pathogenesis, diagnosis, therapy, possibilities of prophylaxis]. Hájek R, Matýsková M. Vnitr Lek; 1995 Jun; 41(6):415-20. PubMed ID: 7676664 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The late complications of totally implantable central venous access ports: the results from an Italian multicenter prospective observation study. Dal Molin A, Rasero L, Guerretta L, Perfetti E, Clerico M. Eur J Oncol Nurs; 2011 Dec; 15(5):377-81. PubMed ID: 21167777 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Prolonged interval in prophylactic heparin flushing for maintenance of subcutaneous implanted port care in patients with cancer. Kefeli U, Dane F, Yumuk PF, Karamanoglu A, Iyikesici S, Basaran G, Turhal NS. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2009 Mar; 18(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19267736 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Elevated levels of D-dimer and fragment 1+2 upon central venous catheter insertion and factor V Leiden predict subclavian vein thrombosis. Jansen FH, van der Straaten HM, Roest M, Haas F, de Groot PG, Fijnheer R. Haematologica; 2005 Apr; 90(4):499-504. PubMed ID: 15820946 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]