These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Treatment effects produced by Fränkel appliance in patients with class II, division 1 malocclusion. Rodrigues de Almeida M, Castanha Henriques JF, Rodrigues de Almeida R, Ursi W. Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):418-25. PubMed ID: 12401050 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Mandibular incisor position changes in relation to amount of bite jumping during Herbst/multibracket appliance treatment: a radiographic-cephalometric study. Martin J, Pancherz H. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 19577147 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Effectiveness of twin-block and Mandibular Protraction Appliance-IV in the improvement of pharyngeal airway passage dimensions in Class II malocclusion subjects with a retrognathic mandible. Jena AK, Singh SP, Utreja AK. Angle Orthod; 2013 Jul; 83(4):728-34. PubMed ID: 23241007 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Cephalometric study of Class II Division 1 patients treated with an extended-duration, reinforced, banded Herbst appliance followed by fixed appliances. Tomblyn T, Rogers M, Andrews L, Martin C, Tremont T, Gunel E, Ngan P. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):818-830. PubMed ID: 27871709 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Initial and late treatment effects of headgear-Herbst appliance with mandibular step-by-step advancement. Hägg U, Du X, Rabie AB. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Nov; 122(5):477-85. PubMed ID: 12439475 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Changes in soft tissue profile following the treatment using a Herbst appliance--a photographic analysis. Nedeljković N, Cubrilo D, Hadzi-Mihailović M. Vojnosanit Pregl; 2014 Jan; 71(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 24516984 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term comparison of treatment outcome and stability of Class II patients treated with functional appliances versus bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Berger JL, Pangrazio-Kulbersh V, George C, Kaczynski R. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):451-64; quiz 516-7. PubMed ID: 15821690 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes concurrent to use of Twin Block appliance in class II division I cases with a deficient mandible: a cephalometric study. Sharma AK, Sachdev V, Singla A, Kirtaniya BC. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012 Apr; 30(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 23263425 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Treatment effects of the mandibular anterior repositioning appliance on patients with Class II malocclusion. Pangrazio-Kulbersh V, Berger JL, Chermak DS, Kaczynski R, Simon ES, Haerian A. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):286-95. PubMed ID: 12637901 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Treatment effects produced by preorthodontic trainer appliance in patients with class II division I malocclusion. Das UM, Reddy D. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2010 Mar; 28(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 20215669 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]