These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Trial rights and psychotropic drugs: the case against administering involuntary medications to a defendant during trial. Klein DW. Vanderbilt Law Rev; 2002; 55(1):165-218. PubMed ID: 12680366 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Denouement of an execution competency case: is Perry pyrrhic? Mossman D. Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1995; 23(2):269-84. PubMed ID: 8605411 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Involuntary medication of patients who are incompetent to stand trial: a descriptive study of the New York experience with judicial review. Ladds B, Convit A, Zito J, Vitrai J. Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(4):529-45. PubMed ID: 7914440 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Old law meets new medicine: revisiting involuntary psychotropic medication of the criminal defendant. Siegel DM, Grudzinskas AJ, Pinals DA. Wis L Rev; 2001; 2():307-80. PubMed ID: 16281337 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The Ontario Mental Health Act: a review of District Court "competence" decisions. Chandrasena R. Health Law Can; 1991; 12(1):15-9, 31. PubMed ID: 10114433 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Ontario's new law of consent to treatment: potential for liability. Campbell CL. Leadersh Health Serv; 1995; 4(4):9-11. PubMed ID: 10144383 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]