These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


567 related items for PubMed ID: 19651334

  • 1. Rate of tooth movement under heavy and light continuous orthodontic forces.
    Yee JA, Türk T, Elekdağ-Türk S, Cheng LL, Darendeliler MA.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):150.e1-9; discussion 150-1. PubMed ID: 19651334
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A clinical comparison between nickel titanium springs and elastomeric chains.
    Bokas J, Woods M.
    Aust Orthod J; 2006 May; 22(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 16792244
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Duration and anchorage management of canine retraction with bodily versus tipping mechanics.
    Shpack N, Davidovitch M, Sarne O, Panayi N, Vardimon AD.
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Jan; 78(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 18193953
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Mini-screw implant or transpalatal arch-mediated anchorage reinforcement during canine retraction: a randomized clinical trial.
    Sharma M, Sharma V, Khanna B.
    J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 39(2):102-10. PubMed ID: 22773673
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Tooth movement rate and anchorage lost during canine retraction: A maxillary and mandibular comparison.
    da C Monini A, Gandini LG, Vianna AP, Martins RP, Jacob HB.
    Angle Orthod; 2019 Jul; 89(4):559-565. PubMed ID: 30741577
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Evaluation of corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics and piezocision in rapid canine retraction.
    Abbas NH, Sabet NE, Hassan IT.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Apr; 149(4):473-80. PubMed ID: 27021451
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A comparison of lower canine retraction and loss of anchorage between conventional and self-ligating brackets: a single-center randomized split-mouth controlled trial.
    da Costa Monini A, Júnior LGG, Vianna AP, Martins RP.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 May; 21(4):1047-1053. PubMed ID: 27246754
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 29.