These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

200 related items for PubMed ID: 19663924

  • 1. Intra-examiner repeatability and agreement in accommodative response measurements.
    Antona B, Sanchez I, Barrio A, Barra F, Gonzalez E.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 Nov; 29(6):606-14. PubMed ID: 19663924
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A comparison of the reliability of dynamic retinoscopy and subjective measurements of amplitude of accommodation.
    León AÁ, Medrano SM, Rosenfield M.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2012 Mar; 32(2):133-41. PubMed ID: 22268597
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Evaluation of infant accommodation using retinoscopy and photoretinoscopy.
    Gabriel GM, Mutti DO.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Mar; 86(3):208-15. PubMed ID: 19165126
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. MEM and Nott dynamic retinoscopy in patients with disorders of vergence and accommodation.
    García A, Cacho P.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2002 May; 22(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 12090636
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Variation and correlation of clinical tests of accommodative function in a sample of school-age children.
    Jackson TW, Goss DA.
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1991 Nov; 62(11):857-66. PubMed ID: 1813515
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Accommodative lag by autorefraction and two dynamic retinoscopy methods.
    Correction of Myopia Evaluation Trial 2 Study Group for the Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group, Manny RE, Chandler DL, Scheiman MM, Gwiazda JE, Cotter SA, Everett DF, Holmes JM, Hyman LG, Kulp MT, Lyon DW, Marsh-Tootle W, Matta N, Melia BM, Norton TT, Repka MX, Silbert DI, Weissberg EM.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Mar; 86(3):233-43. PubMed ID: 19214130
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A comparison study of dynamic retinoscopy techniques.
    Locke LC, Somers W.
    Optom Vis Sci; 1989 Aug; 66(8):540-4. PubMed ID: 2771345
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison between MEM and Nott dynamic retinoscopy.
    del Pilar Cacho M, García-Muñoz A, García-Bernabeu JR, López A.
    Optom Vis Sci; 1999 Sep; 76(9):650-5. PubMed ID: 10498007
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of Dynamic Retinoscopy and Autorefraction for Measurement of Accommodative Amplitude.
    Aboumourad R, Anderson HA.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Sep; 96(9):670-677. PubMed ID: 31479022
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.