These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

215 related items for PubMed ID: 19665192

  • 1. Radiologically documented adjacent-segment degeneration after cervical arthroplasty: characteristics and review of cases.
    Yi S, Lee DY, Ahn PG, Kim KN, Yoon DH, Shin HC.
    Surg Neurol; 2009 Oct; 72(4):325-9; discussion 329. PubMed ID: 19665192
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Anterior transvertebral herniotomy for cervical disc herniation: a long-term follow-up study.
    Sakai T, Katoh S, Sairyo K, Tamura T, Hirohashi N, Higashino K, Yasui N.
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Aug; 22(6):408-12. PubMed ID: 19652566
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Intermediate clinical and radiological results of cervical TDR (Mobi-C) with up to 2 years of follow-up.
    Beaurain J, Bernard P, Dufour T, Fuentes JM, Hovorka I, Huppert J, Steib JP, Vital JM, Aubourg L, Vila T.
    Eur Spine J; 2009 Jun; 18(6):841-50. PubMed ID: 19434431
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Assessment of adjacent-segment disease in patients treated with cervical fusion or arthroplasty: a prospective 2-year study.
    Robertson JT, Papadopoulos SM, Traynelis VC.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2005 Dec; 3(6):417-23. PubMed ID: 16381202
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Uncovertebral hypertrophy is a significant risk factor for the occurrence of heterotopic ossification after cervical disc replacement: survivorship analysis of Bryan disc for single-level cervical arthroplasty.
    Chung SB, Muradov JM, Lee SH, Eoh W, Kim ES.
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2012 Jun; 154(6):1017-22. PubMed ID: 22421919
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. An analysis of heterotopic ossification in cervical disc arthroplasty: a novel morphologic classification of an ossified mass.
    Jin YJ, Park SB, Kim MJ, Kim KJ, Kim HJ.
    Spine J; 2013 Apr; 13(4):408-20. PubMed ID: 23332520
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Analysis of factors that may influence range of motion after cervical disc arthroplasty.
    Kim SW, Paik SH, Castro PA, Baek SW, Shin DJ, Kwak YH, Ju YS.
    Spine J; 2010 Aug; 10(8):683-8. PubMed ID: 20537960
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Quality of spinal motion with cervical disk arthroplasty: computer-aided radiographic analysis.
    Powell JW, Sasso RC, Metcalf NH, Anderson PA, Hipp JA.
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Apr; 23(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 20051921
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Cervical disc replacement C5-6.
    Bonkowski J, Avadhani A, Manu A, Rajasekaran S.
    Eur Spine J; 2010 Feb; 19(2):345-6. PubMed ID: 20130928
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.