These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

165 related items for PubMed ID: 19669176

  • 1. Three-year randomised clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance, quantitative and qualitative wear patterns of hybrid composite restorations.
    Palaniappan S, Elsen L, Lijnen I, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2010 Aug; 14(4):441-58. PubMed ID: 19669176
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Nanohybrid and microfilled hybrid versus conventional hybrid composite restorations: 5-year clinical wear performance.
    Palaniappan S, Elsen L, Lijnen I, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Feb; 16(1):181-90. PubMed ID: 21221678
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Three-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance and wear of a nanocomposite versus a hybrid composite.
    Palaniappan S, Bharadwaj D, Mattar DL, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P.
    Dent Mater; 2009 Nov; 25(11):1302-14. PubMed ID: 19577288
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Four-year evaluation of a resin composite including nanofillers in posterior cavities.
    Schirrmeister JF, Huber K, Hellwig E, Hahn P.
    J Adhes Dent; 2009 Oct; 11(5):399-404. PubMed ID: 19841767
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Ten-year Clinical Performance of Posterior Resin Composite Restorations.
    Krämer N, Reinelt C, Frankenberger R.
    J Adhes Dent; 2015 Aug; 17(5):433-41. PubMed ID: 26525008
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Two-year clinical evaluation of ormocer, nanohybrid and nanofill composite restorative systems in posterior teeth.
    Mahmoud SH, El-Embaby AE, AbdAllah AM, Hamama HH.
    J Adhes Dent; 2008 Aug; 10(4):315-22. PubMed ID: 18792703
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A randomized 10-year prospective follow-up of Class II nanohybrid and conventional hybrid resin composite restorations.
    van Dijken JW, Pallesen U.
    J Adhes Dent; 2014 Dec; 16(6):585-92. PubMed ID: 25516885
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Nanohybrid vs. fine hybrid composite in Class II cavities: clinical results and margin analysis after four years.
    Krämer N, Reinelt C, Richter G, Petschelt A, Frankenberger R.
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jun; 25(6):750-9. PubMed ID: 19237189
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. In vivo evaluation of the surface of posterior resin composite restorations: a pilot study.
    Pesun IJ, Olson AK, Hodges JS, Anderson GC.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Sep; 84(3):353-9. PubMed ID: 11005910
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results.
    Mendonça JS, Neto RG, Santiago SL, Lauris JR, Navarro MF, de Carvalho RM.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 May 01; 11(3):025-32. PubMed ID: 20461321
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.