These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy as a primary modality for large proximal ureteral calculi: comparison to rigid ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy. Ko YH, Kang SG, Park JY, Bae JH, Kang SH, Cho DY, Park HS, Cheon J, Lee JG, Kim JJ. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2011; 21(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 21190478 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective randomized study of treatment of large proximal ureteral stones: extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureterolithotripsy versus laparoscopy. Lopes Neto AC, Korkes F, Silva JL, Amarante RD, Mattos MH, Tobias-Machado M, Pompeo AC. J Urol; 2012 Jan; 187(1):164-8. PubMed ID: 22100003 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy compared with ureteroscopy for the removal of small distal ureteral stones. Hautmann S, Friedrich MG, Fernandez S, Steuber T, Hammerer P, Braun PM, Jünemann KP, Huland H. Urol Int; 2004 Jan; 73(3):238-43. PubMed ID: 15539843 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Ureteroscopic treatment of ureteric lithiasis. Analysis of 354 urs procedures in a community hospital. du Fossé W, Billiet I, Mattelaer J. Acta Urol Belg; 1998 Oct; 66(3):33-40. PubMed ID: 9864877 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-effectiveness comparison of ureteral calculi treated with ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy versus shockwave lithotripsy. Cone EB, Pareek G, Ursiny M, Eisner B. World J Urol; 2017 Jan; 35(1):161-166. PubMed ID: 27145788 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-effectiveness analysis of ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy and shock wave lithotripsy in the management of ureteral calculi in eastern China. Zhang J, Shi Q, Wang GZ, Wang F, Jiang N. Urol Int; 2011 Jan; 86(4):470-5. PubMed ID: 21597268 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]