These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
633 related items for PubMed ID: 19673959
1. Evaluation of dimensional accuracy of panoramic cross-sectional tomography, its ability to identify the inferior alveolar canal, and its impact on estimation of appropriate implant dimensions in the mandibular posterior region. Mehra A, Pai KM. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Mar; 14(1):100-11. PubMed ID: 19673959 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiologic measurements of the mandible: a comparison between CT-reformatted and conventional tomographic images. Hanazawa T, Sano T, Seki K, Okano T. Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Apr; 15(2):226-32. PubMed ID: 15008935 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The role of objective plane angulation on the mandibular image using cross-sectional tomography. Naitoh M, Katsumata A, Kubota Y, Okumura S, Hayashi H, Ariji E. J Oral Implantol; 2006 Apr; 32(3):117-21. PubMed ID: 16836175 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliability of hypocycloidal tomography for the evaluation of the distance from the alveolar crest to the mandibular canal. Gröndahl K, Ekestubbe A, Gröndahl HG, Johnsson T. Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 Nov; 20(4):200-4. PubMed ID: 1808007 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A precise radiographic method to determine the location of the inferior alveolar canal in the posterior edentulous mandible: implications for dental implants. Part 1: Technique. Stella JP, Tharanon W. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1990 Nov; 5(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 2391135 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of vertical height measurements on direct digital panoramic radiographs using posterior mandibular implants and metal balls as reference objects. Vazquez L, Nizamaldin Y, Combescure C, Nedir R, Bischof M, Dohan Ehrenfest DM, Carrel JP, Belser UC. Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013 Nov; 42(2):20110429. PubMed ID: 23360688 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of mandibular positioning on preimplant site measurement of the mandible in reformatted CT. Kim KD, Jeong HG, Choi SH, Hwang EH, Park CS. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2003 Apr; 23(2):177-83. PubMed ID: 12710821 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of panoramic radiography with computed tomography in the planning of implant surgery. Tal H, Moses O. Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 Feb; 20(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 1884852 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of bone width lateral to the mandibular canal as an alternative approach for implant installation. Daróz SR, Cardoso ES, Manso MC, Vidigal GM. Implant Dent; 2013 Feb; 22(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 23303270 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability of panoramic radiography in determination of neurosensory disturbances related to dental implant placement in posterior mandible. Kütük N, Gönen ZB, Yaşar MT, Demirbaş AE, Alkan A. Implant Dent; 2014 Dec; 23(6):648-52. PubMed ID: 25365650 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Position of the mental foramen on panoramic radiographs and its relation to the horizontal course of the mandibular canal: a computed tomographic analysis. Pyun JH, Lim YJ, Kim MJ, Ahn SJ, Kim J. Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24(8):890-5. PubMed ID: 22220715 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]