These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
928 related items for PubMed ID: 19681962
1. Accuracy of a newly developed integrated system for dental implant planning. Dreiseidler T, Neugebauer J, Ritter L, Lingohr T, Rothamel D, Mischkowski RA, Zöller JE. Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1191-9. PubMed ID: 19681962 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Factors influencing transfer accuracy of cone beam CT-derived template-based implant placement. Behneke A, Burwinkel M, Behneke N. Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):416-23. PubMed ID: 22092586 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of a computerized tomography-guided template-assisted implant placement system: an in vitro study. Horwitz J, Zuabi O, Machtei EE. Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1156-62. PubMed ID: 19519787 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability of implant placement after virtual planning of implant positions using cone beam CT data and surgical (guide) templates. Nickenig HJ, Eitner S. J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2007 Oct; 35(4-5):207-11. PubMed ID: 17576068 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Implant placement accuracy when using stereolithographic template as a surgical guide: preliminary results. Al-Harbi SA, Sun AY. Implant Dent; 2009 Feb; 18(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 19212237 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Placement of posterior maxillary implants in partially edentulous patients with severe bone deficiency using CAD/CAM guidance to avoid sinus grafting: a clinical report of procedure. Fortin T, Isidori M, Bouchet H. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009 Feb; 24(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 19344031 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A prospective study on the accuracy of mucosally supported stereolithographic surgical guides in fully edentulous maxillae. D'haese J, Van De Velde T, Elaut L, De Bruyn H. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):293-303. PubMed ID: 19906267 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Accurate implant placement. Digital scanning and use of tooth-guided, tooth-supported surgical guides. Jones PE. Dent Today; 2013 Nov; 32(11):124, 126, 128. PubMed ID: 24358550 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A clinically relevant accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the edentulous maxilla using mucosa-supported surgical templates. Verhamme LM, Meijer GJ, Boumans T, de Haan AF, Bergé SJ, Maal TJ. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Apr; 17(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 23879524 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Parameters of passive fit using a new technique to mill implant-supported superstructures: an in vitro study of a novel three-dimensional force measurement-misfit method. Tahmaseb A, van de Weijden JJ, Mercelis P, De Clerck R, Wismeijer D. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010 Apr; 25(2):247-57. PubMed ID: 20369082 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. CAD/CAM-guided implant surgery and fabrication of an immediately loaded prosthesis for a partially edentulous patient. Marchack CB. J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6):389-94. PubMed ID: 17618922 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Rehabilitation of a dentate mandible requiring a full arch rehabilitation. Immediate loading of a fixed complete denture on 8 implants placed with a bone-supported surgical computer-planned guide: a case report. Amorfini L, Storelli S, Romeo E. J Oral Implantol; 2011 Mar; 37 Spec No():106-13. PubMed ID: 21495798 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]