These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

632 related items for PubMed ID: 19700530

  • 21. Analysis of intensity variability in multislice and cone beam computed tomography.
    Nackaerts O, Maes F, Yan H, Couto Souza P, Pauwels R, Jacobs R.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Aug; 22(8):873-9. PubMed ID: 21244502
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Cone-beam CT versus multi-slice CT systems for postoperative imaging of cochlear implantation--a phantom study on image quality and radiation exposure using human temporal bones.
    Theunisse HJ, Joemai RM, Maal TJ, Geleijns J, Mylanus EA, Verbist BM.
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Apr; 36(4):592-9. PubMed ID: 25420084
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Assessment of bone segmentation quality of cone-beam CT versus multislice spiral CT: a pilot study.
    Loubele M, Maes F, Schutyser F, Marchal G, Jacobs R, Suetens P.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Aug; 102(2):225-34. PubMed ID: 16876067
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. A comparative evaluation of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and Multi-Slice CT (MSCT) Part I. On subjective image quality.
    Liang X, Jacobs R, Hassan B, Li L, Pauwels R, Corpas L, Souza PC, Martens W, Shahbazian M, Alonso A, Lambrichts I.
    Eur J Radiol; 2010 Aug; 75(2):265-9. PubMed ID: 19410409
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners.
    Pauwels R, Beinsberger J, Collaert B, Theodorakou C, Rogers J, Walker A, Cockmartin L, Bosmans H, Jacobs R, Bogaerts R, Horner K, SEDENTEXCT Project Consortium.
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Feb; 81(2):267-71. PubMed ID: 21196094
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Cone-beam CT dose and imaging performance evaluation with a modular, multipurpose phantom.
    Siewerdsen JH, Uneri A, Hernandez AM, Burkett GW, Boone JM.
    Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 47(2):467-479. PubMed ID: 31808950
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. 3D cone-beam CT of the ankle using a novel twin robotic X-ray system: Assessment of image quality and radiation dose.
    Grunz JP, Kunz AS, Gietzen CH, Weng AM, Veyhl-Wichmann M, Ergün S, Schmitt R, Bley TA, Gassenmaier T.
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Oct; 119():108659. PubMed ID: 31520930
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Effective Radiation Dose in the Wrist Resulting from a Radiographic Device, Two CBCT Devices and One MSCT Device: A Comparative Study.
    Koivisto J, van Eijnatten M, Kiljunen T, Shi XQ, Wolff J.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Apr 01; 179(1):58-68. PubMed ID: 29040707
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Image quality vs radiation dose of four cone beam computed tomography scanners.
    Loubele M, Jacobs R, Maes F, Denis K, White S, Coudyzer W, Lambrichts I, van Steenberghe D, Suetens P.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Sep 01; 37(6):309-18. PubMed ID: 18757715
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 32.