These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

216 related items for PubMed ID: 1970298

  • 1. A randomized double-blind study of bisoprolol versus atenolol in mild to moderate essential hypertension.
    Dixon MS, Thomas P, Sheridan DJ.
    Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 1990; 38(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 1970298
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A comparison of bisoprolol and atenolol in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension.
    Lewis R, Maclean D, Ioannides C, Johnston A, McDevitt DG.
    Br J Clin Pharmacol; 1988 Jul; 26(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 2904825
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Double-blind comparison of the cardioselective beta-blockers bisoprolol and atenolol in hypertension: the Bisoprolol International Multicenter Study (BIMS).
    Bühler FR, Berglund G, Anderson OK, Brunner HR, Scherrer U, van Brummelen P, Distler A, Philipp T, Fogari R, Mimran A.
    J Cardiovasc Pharmacol; 1986 Jul; 8 Suppl 11():S122-7. PubMed ID: 2439782
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A comparison of the effects of bisoprolol and atenolol on lipoprotein concentrations and blood pressure.
    Lithell H, Weiner L, Selinus I, Vessby B.
    J Cardiovasc Pharmacol; 1986 Jul; 8 Suppl 11():S128-33. PubMed ID: 2439783
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of a new vasodilating beta-blocker, carvedilol, with atenolol in the treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension.
    Ruilope LM.
    Am J Hypertens; 1994 Feb; 7(2):129-36. PubMed ID: 7910028
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A double-blind comparison of bisoprolol and atenolol in patients with essential hypertension.
    Wheeldon NM, MacDonald TM, Prasad N, Maclean D, Peebles L, McDevitt DG.
    QJM; 1995 Aug; 88(8):565-70. PubMed ID: 7648243
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A comparison of carvedilol with atenolol in the treatment of mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. INT-CAR-07 (U.K.) Study Group.
    Young PH.
    J Cardiovasc Pharmacol; 1992 Aug; 19 Suppl 1():S82-5. PubMed ID: 1378155
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A randomized double-blind study of atenolol and celiprolol in mild to moderate hypertension.
    Silke B, Rosenthal F, Taylor S.
    J Cardiovasc Pharmacol; 1986 Aug; 8 Suppl 4():S122-6. PubMed ID: 2427841
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [The effects of bisoprolol and atenolol on glucose metabolism in hypertensive patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus].
    Vulpis V, Antonacci A, Prandi P, Bokor D, Pirrelli A.
    Minerva Med; 1991 Apr; 82(4):189-93. PubMed ID: 1673233
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Management of chronic stable angina with once-daily bisoprolol or atenolol and long-term efficacy of bisoprolol.
    Kohli RS, Lahiri A, Raftery EB.
    J Cardiovasc Pharmacol; 1986 Apr; 8 Suppl 11():S148-53. PubMed ID: 2439787
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of talinolol and atenolol effects on blood pressure in relation to lipid and glucose metabolic parameters. Results from the TALIP study.
    Sourgens H, Schmidt J, Derendorf H.
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2003 Jan; 41(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 12564742
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Application of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in differentiating between antihypertensive agents.
    Neutel JM, Smith DH, Ram CV, Kaplan NM, Papademetriou V, Fagan TC, Lefkowitz MP, Kazempour MK, Weber MA.
    Am J Med; 1993 Feb; 94(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 8430713
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A double-blind comparison of bisoprolol and captopril for treatment of essential hypertension in the elderly.
    Bracchetti D, Gradnik R, Alberti A, Brunelli A, Orselli L, Leonardi G, Pavesi PC, Cantelli I.
    Cardiovasc Drugs Ther; 1990 Feb; 4(1):261-4. PubMed ID: 1981017
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of antihypertensive and beta 1-adrenoceptor antagonist effect of nebivolol and atenolol in essential hypertension.
    Simon G, Johnson ML.
    Clin Exp Hypertens; 1993 May; 15(3):501-9. PubMed ID: 8098243
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of bevantolol and atenolol for systemic hypertension.
    Fairhurst GJ.
    Am J Cardiol; 1986 Nov 26; 58(12):25E-27E. PubMed ID: 2878597
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Multicenter evaluation of the hemodynamic effects of bisoprolol in patients with mild to moderate hypertension.
    Prisant LM, Carr AA, Desnoyers M, Westcott RJ, Zinny MA, O'Donnell DM, Bryzinski B, McKee B, Nelson BR.
    J Clin Pharmacol; 1990 Dec 26; 30(12):1096-101. PubMed ID: 1980278
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of the antihypertensive effects of betaxolol to atenolol.
    Mroczek WJ, Burris JF, Hogan LB, Citron DC, Barker AH, McDonald RH.
    Am J Cardiol; 1988 Apr 01; 61(10):807-11. PubMed ID: 2895577
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.